Gee Cunt, you really should read what you responded to and see that the treatment wasn't the topic.
![God, I'm bored! :bored:](./images/smilies/bored.gif)
Gee Cunt, you really should read what you responded to and see that the treatment wasn't the topic.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
How about you show me what part of my initial post references their character.
How about my follow up when you first tried to change the subject?
So you want to have a conversation about smart social media marketing, or keep on with the nasty liberals trying to cancel the noble conservatives troll you like so much?Joe wrote: ↑Wed Feb 10, 2021 2:20 amMeh, let's talk about my point instead.
Heyer and Weinstein are a good example of using the cache of being outsiders to boost their brand. Weinstein put together the Intellectual Dark Web website and Heyer bills herself as a Professor in Exile, even though they are clearly doing okay. They live well, and before COVID, could travel freely to other countries to do research.
I don't fault them. They're living the good life and doing what they love and so what if they market themselves as a little outlaw.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Nope, I didn't even write that, but nice troll.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
They have smart social media marketing.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
It doesn't sound like we disagree, but why did it take 20 posts and almost a day to arrive at that? That wasn't me buddy. You're the guy who kept going off on irrelevant tangents.
I'm going to light a doobie, go finish the tyvek, and try to make sense of this.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
I spent a fair amount of time composing a response to that post, including links. When I attempted to post it I discovered that an admin was tinkering with the site and the post was consigned to oblivion. It was late Saturday night for me, Sunday morning at headquarters--completely understandable, but a bit disheartening.Joe wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:25 pmWow, you are running with Sasquatch! Did Spygate unravel? Did the Durham report drop?Cunt wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:33 amRight, no crimes by the President. No 'Russian Collusion' conspiracy.L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:20 amYou appear to be labouring under the impression that Mueller's purpose was to take down Trump. Did your ever-so-reliable sources tell you that's what you should believe?
This IS in the right thread, but I feel funny being the reasonable one. Lets look at better ones.
The Dark Horse Podcasters are talking about the 'rona origin story again. Those rascals.
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cH ... HQAAAAAQAgIn this episode, we begin by discussing what the increasing visibility of a viable hypothesis for the origins of SARS-CoV2 says about modern science and politics.
I know you didn't read the Mueller Report or you wouldn't be talking about collusion.
But you're right, the Conspiracy Theories thread is the right place for such talk.![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests