L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:30 am
Cunt wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:08 am
L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 2:02 am
You say you read the article, but I wonder if that's an accurate description of what you did.
If you read it in the article, then it should be easy for you to show me with accurate quotes from the article how Podhorzer and the groups that worked with him stole the election. You will be able to demonstrate with accurate quotes from the article that what they did was unfair, and to whom it was unfair.
If you read the article you must realize that 'the tech companies' played a minimal part in the effort, and that the things that probably made the biggest difference in how the election was handled had next to nothing to do with them. Why do you make a point of giving them credit for it?
It's a great article because righties have no problem seeing the 'steal', while lefties can't see it at all. There are some few in the middle who can see both sides of it maybe, but I don't know any.
So I misspoke about the tech companies. Is that better, Lemmy? Does it change the fact that a cabal of the powerful is working behind the scenes to get their chosen candidate elected? For your own good, of course.
No support for your claims, no quotes from the article, you just assert that you can 'see the the "steal"' and leave it at that. I understand. Those quotes are certainly in there, right? You're just too busy listening to Crowder and Pool
Crowder and Pool say they see it as a steal. I know that from the titles of their podcasts, and what they said. They are the righties who can 'see the steal'.
to waste your time demonstrating something that would be obvious to anybody who isn't blinded by their political leaning. The article clearly recounts how the election was stolen, and if I don't see that it's my own failing, is that it?
I don't think you misspoke. I think you've allowed propagandists to make 'the tech companies' some kind of universal bad actor in your mind, and if there's something going on in politics and public life that you disapprove of, it's bound to be the fault of 'the tech companies' boogeyman.
The tech companies are some kind of universal bad actor in my mind. I condemn them all, until they give me reason to improve my view of them.
The biggest tech companies are the most suspicious, to me.
They aren't a boogeyman, but they are in the pocket of governments (of course)
Remember what Pompeo said about apple? I don't remember exactly when, but he pointed out that a strict communist country like China would NEVER let apple in without having backdoor access to ios. I don't think his credibility has to come into question to consider that the most authoritarian governments have similar interests, and will try to take advantage of the data mining coming in through iDevices ANDothers.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.