Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
LOL - that looks disgusting.Tero wrote:Just shut up kid, this is America. We can't do good school lunches here, even when we pay for it. Good school lunches for free is socialism!
And, I take it that is Finland. Let's see some evidence that middle and high school kids eat off of tableware and use silverware for forks and knives and have glass chalices to drink their milk out of.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
LOL -- coming from a Demorat, that's a compliment. Go support some more crony capitalism. That's your thing.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Ah, there's a good Repulsive.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Bain Capital.Coito ergo sum wrote:LOL -- coming from a Demorat, that's a compliment. Go support some more crony capitalism. That's your thing.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Ah, there's a good Repulsive.
- normal
- !

- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
- About me: meh
- Location: North, and then some
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...

Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
-Douglas Adams-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
- colubridae
- Custom Rank: Rank
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
- About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
- Location: Birmingham art gallery
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Have no idea what it means, but I like it.Coito ergo sum wrote:... jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Nobody could fix it in one term? Under Reagan, he inherited higher unemployment, 10+% inflation, 10+% interest rates, and a stagnant economy, highest gas prices ever, with a country in malaise just 5 years after the fall of Saigon. In four years, inflation was down, interest rates were down, gas prices were down, unemployment was down, and taxes were down.Kristie wrote:He can fix it. He just needs cooperation, and he's not getting any from Republicans. He also needs more time. With everything you listed, no one could fix it all in one term, especially with no cooperation.Coito ergo sum wrote:You mean other than the still shitty economy, the skyrocketing debt adding $1.2 trillion a year, more debt monetization and quantitative easing, high inflation on necessaries, doubled gas prices during the Obama administration, unemployment over 8% and real unemployment at about 11%, lowest percentage of population in the workforce in like a half century, taxmaggeddon on the horizon in 90 days, a shitty housing market, lowest homeownership rates in decades, 47 million Americans on food stamps, the shittiest economic recovery in nearly a century, anemic growth in both jobs and gdp (barely keeping us out of a "technical" recession)....Gawdzilla Sama wrote:My meaning was this is all the GOPpies have to complain about.Kristie wrote:Yeah, because kids vote.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I guess it's official. This election is over.
Peak unemployment in the early 1980's was higher than it is now -- and back then it was coupled with extremely high inflation and very high interest rates at the same time. That's what Reagan inherited, and nobody went around saying "he can't fix it immediately!!!" He did the right economic things in his first term and got it turned around. Today, interest rates are way down and inflation, we are told, is fairly low -- back then inflation was in double digits and interest rates were so high people had mortgages with rates like 10% and more - for the last 8 years, interest rates for mortgages have been like 4% to 5%.
If Obama can't fix it, then move on. Let someone else have a go.
And, again, for the first 2 years of Obama's term, he didn't need "cooperation" from Republicans. He had unprecedented support from a Democratic House of Representatives and Democrat Senate. He had far more "support" than any other President ever had. He used his first 2 years, though, to spend his political capital on Obamacare instead of fixing the economy.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
....assholes succeeding in changing the culture...colubridae wrote:Have no idea what it means, but I like it.Coito ergo sum wrote:... jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
normal wrote: And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised anywhere on Earth.

-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Leftover fiskeboller and komper?normal wrote:I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school? They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way? It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team? I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
Now these children think they're horribly oppressed because their special interests weren't taken into account. They're all like "Obama: don't do that!"
I'm not the skepchick in this situation. These football brats are.
And since when have children not complained about school lunches?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
- normal
- !

- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
- About me: meh
- Location: North, and then some
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
Usually just brødskiver with pålegg of various sorts. And you can pay for your kids to get milk every school day.Coito ergo sum wrote:Leftover fiskeboller and komper?normal wrote:I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...

Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
-Douglas Adams-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
no.Robert_S wrote:Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school?Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
Only funding for the sports they play in.Robert_S wrote: They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way?
Not in high school. College, yes.Robert_S wrote: It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team?
Err...no...they just seem to think the new food sucks, and the portions are too small given their activity level. Not all students sit around playing video games after school. Those that are active need more than 2000 or 2500 calories per day. If I only ate 2500 calories per day during high school, I would literally have passed out. I studied in college level and advanced placement courses, and played two sports. I probably burned around 1500 calories in soccer practice alone, and a similar amount if not more in a game.Robert_S wrote: I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.
Now these children think they're horribly oppressed because their special interests weren't taken into account. They're all like "Obama: don't do that!"
I just think it's hilarious, as is the predictable scrambling from Obama devotees to justify everything they do.Robert_S wrote:
I'm not the skepchick in this situation. These football brats are.
And since when have children not complained about school lunches?
- Kristie
- Elastigirl
- Posts: 25108
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:14 pm
- About me: From there to here, and here to there, funny things are everywhere!
- Location: Probably at Target
- Contact:
Re: Student's Protest Obama's Crappy School Lunch Mandates
But tell me, why don't windows on airplanes roll down? It's very dangerous.Coito ergo sum wrote:no.Robert_S wrote:Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school?Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?Only funding for the sports they play in.Robert_S wrote: They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way?Not in high school. College, yes.Robert_S wrote: It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team?Err...no...they just seem to think the new food sucks, and the portions are too small given their activity level. Not all students sit around playing video games after school. Those that are active need more than 2000 or 2500 calories per day. If I only ate 2500 calories per day during high school, I would literally have passed out. I studied in college level and advanced placement courses, and played two sports. I probably burned around 1500 calories in soccer practice alone, and a similar amount if not more in a game.Robert_S wrote: I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.
Now these children think they're horribly oppressed because their special interests weren't taken into account. They're all like "Obama: don't do that!"
I just think it's hilarious, as is the predictable scrambling from Obama devotees to justify everything they do.Robert_S wrote:
I'm not the skepchick in this situation. These football brats are.
And since when have children not complained about school lunches?
We danced.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
