Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...

Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
LOL - that looks disgusting.Tero wrote:Just shut up kid, this is America. We can't do good school lunches here, even when we pay for it. Good school lunches for free is socialism!
LOL -- coming from a Demorat, that's a compliment. Go support some more crony capitalism. That's your thing.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Ah, there's a good Repulsive.
Bain Capital.Coito ergo sum wrote:LOL -- coming from a Demorat, that's a compliment. Go support some more crony capitalism. That's your thing.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Ah, there's a good Repulsive.
I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. -Douglas Adams
I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
Have no idea what it means, but I like it.Coito ergo sum wrote:... jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.
Nobody could fix it in one term? Under Reagan, he inherited higher unemployment, 10+% inflation, 10+% interest rates, and a stagnant economy, highest gas prices ever, with a country in malaise just 5 years after the fall of Saigon. In four years, inflation was down, interest rates were down, gas prices were down, unemployment was down, and taxes were down.Kristie wrote:He can fix it. He just needs cooperation, and he's not getting any from Republicans. He also needs more time. With everything you listed, no one could fix it all in one term, especially with no cooperation.Coito ergo sum wrote:You mean other than the still shitty economy, the skyrocketing debt adding $1.2 trillion a year, more debt monetization and quantitative easing, high inflation on necessaries, doubled gas prices during the Obama administration, unemployment over 8% and real unemployment at about 11%, lowest percentage of population in the workforce in like a half century, taxmaggeddon on the horizon in 90 days, a shitty housing market, lowest homeownership rates in decades, 47 million Americans on food stamps, the shittiest economic recovery in nearly a century, anemic growth in both jobs and gdp (barely keeping us out of a "technical" recession)....Gawdzilla Sama wrote:My meaning was this is all the GOPpies have to complain about.Kristie wrote:Yeah, because kids vote.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I guess it's official. This election is over.
Peak unemployment in the early 1980's was higher than it is now -- and back then it was coupled with extremely high inflation and very high interest rates at the same time. That's what Reagan inherited, and nobody went around saying "he can't fix it immediately!!!" He did the right economic things in his first term and got it turned around. Today, interest rates are way down and inflation, we are told, is fairly low -- back then inflation was in double digits and interest rates were so high people had mortgages with rates like 10% and more - for the last 8 years, interest rates for mortgages have been like 4% to 5%.
If Obama can't fix it, then move on. Let someone else have a go.
....assholes succeeding in changing the culture...colubridae wrote:Have no idea what it means, but I like it.Coito ergo sum wrote:... jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.
normal wrote: And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised anywhere on Earth.
Leftover fiskeboller and komper?normal wrote:I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school? They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way? It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team? I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
Usually just brødskiver with pålegg of various sorts. And you can pay for your kids to get milk every school day.Coito ergo sum wrote:Leftover fiskeboller and komper?normal wrote:I'm pretty sure you can choose your lunch yourself when you bring it to school. And I think a lutefisk lunchbox would get you ostracised even in NorwayCoito ergo sum wrote:Yeah but svartpølse sandwiches and lutefisk on the side wouldn't go over well in Merka.normal wrote:Not in socialist Norway either. Everyone brings their own lunchJimC wrote:We don't have any of this socialist school lunch crap in Oz...
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. -Douglas Adams
no.Robert_S wrote:Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school?Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?
Only funding for the sports they play in.Robert_S wrote: They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way?
Not in high school. College, yes.Robert_S wrote: It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team?
Err...no...they just seem to think the new food sucks, and the portions are too small given their activity level. Not all students sit around playing video games after school. Those that are active need more than 2000 or 2500 calories per day. If I only ate 2500 calories per day during high school, I would literally have passed out. I studied in college level and advanced placement courses, and played two sports. I probably burned around 1500 calories in soccer practice alone, and a similar amount if not more in a game.Robert_S wrote: I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.
Now these children think they're horribly oppressed because their special interests weren't taken into account. They're all like "Obama: don't do that!"
I just think it's hilarious, as is the predictable scrambling from Obama devotees to justify everything they do.Robert_S wrote:
I'm not the skepchick in this situation. These football brats are.
And since when have children not complained about school lunches?
But tell me, why don't windows on airplanes roll down? It's very dangerous.Coito ergo sum wrote:no.Robert_S wrote:Um, athletes aren't privileged in high school?Coito ergo sum wrote:I would respond to this, but the fact that you're utilizing Atheism+-speak and making a statement reminiscent of Skepchick mocking of the "fee fees" of the "privileged" made me throw up a little in my mouth. I'll give this a pass, and hope that you aren't an example of those jack-a-lopes succeeding in changing the zeitgeist.Robert_S wrote:The poor pampered privileged football jocks poo-poo-ed the meal plan.
Awwwww. If local accountability works so well, then why were school lunches always crap?Only funding for the sports they play in.Robert_S wrote: They don't get a ton more resources thrown their way?Not in high school. College, yes.Robert_S wrote: It isn't common to cut them a lot of slack in grading and behavioural discipline so they can stay on the team?Err...no...they just seem to think the new food sucks, and the portions are too small given their activity level. Not all students sit around playing video games after school. Those that are active need more than 2000 or 2500 calories per day. If I only ate 2500 calories per day during high school, I would literally have passed out. I studied in college level and advanced placement courses, and played two sports. I probably burned around 1500 calories in soccer practice alone, and a similar amount if not more in a game.Robert_S wrote: I'm using the olde fashioned meaning of privileged here in case you didn't notice.
Now these children think they're horribly oppressed because their special interests weren't taken into account. They're all like "Obama: don't do that!"
I just think it's hilarious, as is the predictable scrambling from Obama devotees to justify everything they do.Robert_S wrote:
I'm not the skepchick in this situation. These football brats are.
And since when have children not complained about school lunches?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests