macdoc wrote:Three apologies - unlike the OP he recognizes reality on AGW and the associated risks.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-gate ... 30699.html
and
Meaningful reductions in carbon emissions, Gates argued, would also necessitate smarter policy on the part of the government. He said that the inability to put in place a carbon tax, or at least a future carbon tax, was the “single greatest failure” of the U.S. policymakers. When his interlocutor, Alan Murray, deputy managing editor of the Wall Street Journal, asked Gates the odds of Congress ever passing a carbon tax, Gates replied, “It depends on the IQ of the American people.”
http://www.independent.com/news/2012/ma ... ng-goleta/
you do get a few things wrong MM - try examining your other assumptions...

If I was to debate the merits of Bill Gates, I would find out the facts first.
I've not read hardly anything about him, and I made that clear in my first post.
I've read LOTS about global warming.
But I don't assume anything about global warming. That's the difference between me and you.
You believe everything you read, so long as it says that man makes the world hot.
I say that nothing's been proved whatsoever, except that the world has warmed about one degree since 1900. That sort of thing happens all the time, and the only thing that indicates it's due to man's activity is a bunch of computer models, which have been massaged until they point to that.
Anyway, you must be going for the derail record. Do you post this crap on other threads because everybody is ignoring your bullshit when you post it where it belongs?