Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:44 pm

Orwellian wrote:The Thought Police have found them out.

Image
After seeing some pictures and videos of Skepchick, I'd say she is like a girl who goes/went to engineering school. She's like a 6 at best in high school, and then she goes to a nerd, math/science-intensive college where the population of men to women is like 7 to 1. So, suddenly a 6 becomes an 8, and she thinks she's hot, and all the guys think she's hot too (because in comparison to the hairy toed birkenstock wearers in the vicinity, she is hot. Atheist and freethinker groups/conferences are like engineering schools - 7 to 1 or 10 to 1 males to females. All the single guys want to meat a nice single girl of like mind, and all the 5's and 6's look like 7's and 8's....
Last edited by Coito ergo sum on Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:46 pm

camoguard wrote:I chalk it up to an interesting intersection between various movements which are all generally progressive. I thought Dawkin's analogy was harsh which made me feel like he wasn't really considering his audience when he said it. The fact that Western women don't have third world levels of oppression doesn't mean that those women aren't forced to learn to cope with systemic levels of oppression on some level.

When I saw the atheist kerflufle between what's-her-face, the-other-lady, and Dawkins, I thought of Schrodinger's Rapist immediately. Dudes who don't realize what position a woman might be in do not have the game they think they have. The corollary, is realizing a woman's point of view isn't an in. I still have to be easy being blown off because you know what, I've seen women comfortable and I've seen them uncomfortable and I've decided it's their call how they want to feel about it. That's not a war I can win without their consent which if uncomfortable, the woman hasn't given. The right to feel uncomfortable strikes me as pretty basic. I don't think we really have a better tool in our toolkit than to wait until later and review the situation to find out how reasonable we think it is.
I read that article when it was linked in comments at Pharyngula. I thought it was pretty brilliant.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Gallstones » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:19 am

I'm back.
But my thoughts are like a wayward ping pong ball inside my head. I am not able to concentrate or focus for more than a moment at a time. Sorry.
What does come out is like blurting, think of Brownian Touretts where random thoughts find a pore in the surface and pass through.

'Find' isn't really accurate. They just happen to be in the right place at the right time--to escape. If thoughts could be said to want to escape.

Molecules can't be said to want to escape, can they?
Thoughts, thoughts might.


Did I just insult some sensitive group?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Gallstones » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:27 am

Coito ergo sum,
How are women supposed to be--IYO?
How do you want them?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:30 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Orwellian wrote:The Thought Police have found them out.

Image
After seeing some pictures and videos of Skepchick, I'd say she is like a girl who goes/went to engineering school. She's like a 6 at best in high school, and then she goes to a nerd, math/science-intensive college where the population of men to women is like 7 to 1. So, suddenly a 6 becomes an 8, and she thinks she's hot, and all the guys think she's hot too (because in comparison to the hairy toed birkenstock wearers in the vicinity, she is hot. Atheist and freethinker groups/conferences are like engineering schools - 7 to 1 or 10 to 1 males to females. All the single guys want to meat a nice single girl of like mind, and all the 5's and 6's look like 7's and 8's....
Hmmm... maybe she's right about all men being sex-obsessed, woman-objectifying wankers. :hehe:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by charlou » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:35 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:All the single guys want to meat a nice single girl of like mind, and all the 5's and 6's look like 7's and 8's....
tehehehe
no fences

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:52 am

Gallstones wrote:I'm back.
But my thoughts are like a wayward ping pong ball inside my head. I am not able to concentrate or focus for more than a moment at a time. Sorry.
What does come out is like blurting, think of Brownian Touretts where random thoughts find a pore in the surface and pass through.

'Find' isn't really accurate. They just happen to be in the right place at the right time--to escape. If thoughts could be said to want to escape.

Molecules can't be said to want to escape, can they?
Thoughts, thoughts might.


Did I just insult some sensitive group?
I like this posting style, Gallstones. Lyrical.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Gallstones » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:54 am

hadespussercats wrote:
Gallstones wrote:I'm back.
But my thoughts are like a wayward ping pong ball inside my head. I am not able to concentrate or focus for more than a moment at a time. Sorry.
What does come out is like blurting, think of Brownian Touretts where random thoughts find a pore in the surface and pass through.

'Find' isn't really accurate. They just happen to be in the right place at the right time--to escape. If thoughts could be said to want to escape.

Molecules can't be said to want to escape, can they?
Thoughts, thoughts might.


Did I just insult some sensitive group?
I like this posting style, Gallstones. Lyrical.
Thank you. :biggrin:

You do understand what is going on on my end, right?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:58 am

Gallstones wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
Gallstones wrote:I'm back.
But my thoughts are like a wayward ping pong ball inside my head. I am not able to concentrate or focus for more than a moment at a time. Sorry.
What does come out is like blurting, think of Brownian Touretts where random thoughts find a pore in the surface and pass through.

'Find' isn't really accurate. They just happen to be in the right place at the right time--to escape. If thoughts could be said to want to escape.

Molecules can't be said to want to escape, can they?
Thoughts, thoughts might.


Did I just insult some sensitive group?
I like this posting style, Gallstones. Lyrical.
Thank you. :biggrin:

You do understand what is going on on my end, right?
I think so. Ping-pong is a useful analogy on a couple of levels?
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

devogue

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by devogue » Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:06 am

Image

That's the New Zealand Immigration process.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74098
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by JimC » Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:16 am

And, in the end, a Kiwi bureaucrat will have his evil way with you...

(they need a change from sheep every now and then...)
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:26 pm

Gallstones wrote:Coito ergo sum,
How are women supposed to be--IYO?
How do you want them?
Are you of the impression that I have suggested that women need to "be" any way in particular? If so, where did you get that impression?

Your question is nonsensical. I am fine with women in general the way they are, and if there was some "way" I wanted women to be, that would be completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread. Women have every right to "be" any way they damn well please.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:28 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Orwellian wrote:The Thought Police have found them out.

Image
After seeing some pictures and videos of Skepchick, I'd say she is like a girl who goes/went to engineering school. She's like a 6 at best in high school, and then she goes to a nerd, math/science-intensive college where the population of men to women is like 7 to 1. So, suddenly a 6 becomes an 8, and she thinks she's hot, and all the guys think she's hot too (because in comparison to the hairy toed birkenstock wearers in the vicinity, she is hot. Atheist and freethinker groups/conferences are like engineering schools - 7 to 1 or 10 to 1 males to females. All the single guys want to meat a nice single girl of like mind, and all the 5's and 6's look like 7's and 8's....
Hmmm... maybe she's right about all men being sex-obsessed, woman-objectifying wankers. :hehe:
The guy next to her is objectifying the fuck out of her in that picture. LOL.

And, suggesting that some people are better looking than others, and that engineering schools and atheist groups tend to have a low number of women and uglier than average people is just a statement of fact. It's not in the least "objectifying" of anyone.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:29 pm

charlou wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:All the single guys want to meat a nice single girl of like mind, and all the 5's and 6's look like 7's and 8's....
tehehehe
Unintentional pun. :snork:

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:43 pm

Malfoy "objectifying" Hermione... Image ...didn't he listen to her? She SAID she was going to bed! :lay:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests