
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/72259,peo ... ist?flush=
Yeah. Big news! America doesn't like every country in the world and thinks that some of their leaders are less than perfect!Charlou wrote:The radio media reports I heard on what was most recently leaked seemed mainly focussed on the fact that the leaked information revealed that some unkind things had been said about world leaders. pffft.
I agree...GreyICE wrote:Yeah, this doesn't fly for most Americans. Frankly, most Americans have a sort of sneaking respect for anyone who exercises free speech with that large a pair of brass testes, even if they think the person is misguided. Calls to kill people over diplomatic cables that even our Defense Secretary doesn't think are a big deal just makes those two failures look even more ridiculous. We're the nation that lets the Wesboro Baptist Church, Neonazis, and Scientologists say as they will, and frankly, most of us like it that way.
Also a good point, but they may not be quite as slack at security as the Yanks...Xamonas Chegwé wrote: Personally, I think it might be more enlightening if Assange managed to get his hands on, and publish, similar documents from a few other countries; say, Iran, Israel, China, Russia, North Korea. Fucking hell - North Korea! Just think what their diplomats might be saying!
Not just that. If he is guilty of these crimes in Sweden then he should face the full weight of the law. Why is he running away? What is he a afraid of? He'll get a fair trial. Sweden isn't a third world corrupt regime ready to lynch him on a whim. He should be safer in a Swedish prison awaiting trial if his fear is the assassins bullet?The Mad Hatter wrote:I wonder how many people who support Assange are also the kind of people who would do this
Assange is a delusional prick. The US has little grounds to prosecute him because of freedom of the press, because he released the documents to the public, not to foreign powers, and he didn't steal them. And the US has publically acknowledged this. The US is competent enough to know that killing him won't do a thing to stem it. If anything it would make it worse. That's how the internet operates, the more you try to silence something the more profuse it becomes.
The problem has always been clear and present, it's an organisation that can, at a whim, release any information it comes in to possession of.
There is no arbiter, they answer to nobody.
Not even to the public.
Recently not only has Assange threatened banks, he also very publically stated Hillary should 'stand down'.
These are not the actions of an objective whistle-blower.
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.
Red herring.The Mad Hatter wrote:I wonder how many people who support Assange are also the kind of people who would do this
Who is doing more for transparency and freedom of speech than you are.Assange is a delusional prick.
Yep. Wikileaks is perfectly legal, and an inevitable backlash against what our governments and societies have become.The US has little grounds to prosecute him because of freedom of the press, because he released the documents to the public, not to foreign powers, and he didn't steal them. And the US has publically acknowledged this.
Oh, I wouldn't count on that. Western governments have done a lot of stupid things, including assassinations and coups, which have come back to bite us all in the ass.The US is competent enough to know that killing him won't do a thing to stem it.
As can any other organization.The problem has always been clear and present, it's an organisation that can, at a whim, release any information it comes in to possession of.
Good.There is no arbiter, they answer to nobody.
The "public" sucks. Easily swayed. Easily distracted. Easily enslaved. Fortunately they suck just a little bit less than our corporate-fascist masters.Not even to the public.
"Threatened"? You mean promised to reveal the truth? The horror!Recently not only has Assange threatened banks,
He has every right to say what he did. He's also right--she should step down, not just because of her orders to spy on UN officials to the point of stealing passwords and DNA(!), but because of the massive leak that occurred on her watch. She should take full responsibility, which for a politician means resigning and allowing someone else, who is not tainted with the stench of the current controversy, to come in and clean up her mess.he also very publically stated Hillary should 'stand down'.
Wikileaks has never claimed to be "objective," only that they promise the real whistle-blowers the widest and most effective dissemination of the materials given to them.These are not the actions of an objective whistle-blower.
Exactly what were we caught doing, though? Using diplomats to gather information? What country doesn't, like... Belgium?Meekychuppet wrote:I love the American take on this. They've been caught pissing in the swimming pool so their response is 'kill the Guy who caught us' rather than 'sorry we pissed in your swimming pool'.
GreyICE wrote:Exactly what were we caught doing, though? Using diplomats to gather information? What country doesn't, like... Belgium?Meekychuppet wrote:I love the American take on this. They've been caught pissing in the swimming pool so their response is 'kill the Guy who caught us' rather than 'sorry we pissed in your swimming pool'.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests