Fighting Social Darwinists

User avatar
Red Katie
Chief Muff Muncher
Posts: 1482
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Bumfuk, Florida
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Red Katie » Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:19 am

Imagine no Michaelangelo. No Da Vinci. No Alan Turing. No Tennessee Williams. No Whitman. No Melville. No Richard the Lion Heart. No Socrates. No Florence Nightingale. No Elizabeth Bishop. No Sappho. No...

But the list goes on forever.
"Her eye was on the sparrow. Her mind was on the dove,
But no one cared and no one dared to speak to her of love.
Her eyes are always hooded. Her claws are sharp as steel.
We teach her not to see too much. We teach her not to feel."

User avatar
Chinaski
Mazel tov cocktail
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:33 am
About me: Barfly
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Chinaski » Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:17 am

No Dumbledore! :o
Is there for honest poverty
That hangs his heid and a' that
The coward slave, we pass him by
We dare be puir for a' that.

Imagehttp://imagegen.last.fm/iTunesFIXED/rec ... mphony.gif[/img2]

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:55 pm

I could happily imagine no George Michael or Graham Norton. Just saying... :whistle:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Feck » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:10 pm

Yeah and an end to ABBA and kitch ,still if all those gay blokes started chasing girls we wouldn't stand a chance ,they can dress properly .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:40 pm

The image of Darwin has been bolted on to just about every movement that has emerged since OOS was first published (or at least, since it was first bastardised by Herbert Spencer - he who actually coined the phrase 'survival of the fittest'.)

Fascists, socialists, communists, conservatives, monetarists and even anarchists have all claimed Darwinian sanction for there theories over the years - and still do. They are all, in my onion, dead wrong. Evolution does not act upon societies in a comparable manner to that in which it acts upon species. There is no gene for 'rich'!

The social Darwinists' claims come directly from Spencer's idea that humanitarianism allowed 'weak' elements to survive in society which hampered the evolution of that society as a whole, whereas leaving those elements to find their own way out of their situations, or else die, strengthened the society. Spencer's ideas of social evolution were based more on Lamarckian ideas than Darwinian - his weak elements striving to become strong resemble Lamarck's giraffes stretching to reach higher leaves. His idea of an evolving society meant one that strived for progress - there is no striving in Darwin's ideas - survive, or survive not, there is no strive.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Red Katie
Chief Muff Muncher
Posts: 1482
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Bumfuk, Florida
Contact:

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by Red Katie » Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:38 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I could happily imagine no George Michael or Graham Norton. Just saying... :whistle:
Yeah. I could do without John Maynard Keynes.
"Her eye was on the sparrow. Her mind was on the dove,
But no one cared and no one dared to speak to her of love.
Her eyes are always hooded. Her claws are sharp as steel.
We teach her not to see too much. We teach her not to feel."

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Fighting Social Darwinists

Post by charlou » Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:10 am

Tangent about Keynesian economic theory split to here: http://rationalia.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1662

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests