The Mad Hatter wrote:You can only object to the idea of 'not a missile' if you believe there is reasonable grounds it could be.
So, present them.
If you have none then you've just wasted everyone's time.
First, this doesn't count as evidence for your claim that it is certainly not a missile.
Second, I never objected to the claim that "it is certainly not a missile". I asked you to back it up with some evidence (which you have not done).
Third, I never claimed it was a missile.
Fourth, I've made no serious claims as to what it was at all. I've only been speculating.
Fifth, if you feel I'm wasting your time don't read my fucking posts.
Sixth, if you do read my posts, do so with a little effort put into comprehending what I'm writing.
In conclusion: your post is a load of bullshit.
But, you wanna play sophist with me? Let's do it baby.
Item a) Define "reasonable grounds"
Item b) I can only object to x if I have "reasonable grounds" to believe otherwise.
There is a teapot orbitting the sun between earth and mars. You may only object if you have "reasonable grounds" to believe otherwise. Give me your cause to object to my teapot claim.
Complete item a before moving on to item b.