Uselesstwit wrote:What is it with the attitude, MZ? Being suspicious is one thing but how is someone she didn't vote for turning out to be town a huge red flag?
Me,attitude? You are kidding right?
Oblivion is playing the loosest game ever. Three clear "errors" in statements made about players actions.
It's ok for Oblivion to reckon she's "leaned" on me. Isn't that the same thing as I'm doing to her? Pretty one-sided view UT.
Charlou:
Jumped on a fluff post out of the blocks. This is the easiest move in the book for scum to make. She got two for one.
Didn't vote, let others rough up Normal a bit and he got over the line.
Feck:
UT, you called it. When I read it it screamed scum. I dunno, believe it or not, I've been wrong before. But I'm calling it as I see it.
He even made a clinching vote on Normal. That doesn't look good on him or Ani unfortunately.
Ani:
I can't see him being so vocal as scum, even defensively. He just played a scum game. Quietly in my view.
Oblivion:
You will see that I had her on my town list, even though she was apparently leaning on me. That was fair play. It seemed townish at the time.
However, as I've continued to assert my views, she seems to have become more and more anxious to discredit me. The "sloppy" play and blaming on RL circumstances is unlike Oblivion. The first game I ever played, she was scum. She used RL to cover for her absence at one point and create sympathy. That's data.
Other than that, I have nothing.
