But we will know that we can't figure it out. We won't know that we need chipotlegenic hydrodamnitallide to kick start life.The Mad Hatter wrote:And until we do, we don't know that we're missing anything.
How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
We won't know that we do need it either.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
True, and if life started elsewhere we may never know. That's the point of this thread, btw.The Mad Hatter wrote:We won't know that we do need it either.
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
The conditions have to be within a certain range ,amino acids have to be stable ,proteins have to be stable and hold their structure, the elements needed for all the amino acids have to be present .that puts quite a lot of limits on where ambiogenisis could take place .




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Feck wrote:The conditions have to be within a certain range ,amino acids have to be stable ,proteins have to be stable and hold their structure, the elements needed for all the amino acids have to be present .that puts quite a lot of limits on where ambiogenisis could take place .
The conditions that we so far believe to be the case.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
I am rather beginning to suspect that even chemical evolution was possible due to physical evolution first, just like the biological evolution was enabled after the chemical evolution. That is to say, perhaps there was a physical evolutionary process (the coming together of subsubsubparticles to create a stable substance known as atom), that had kept evolving until what we decided to define as biology, is in fact simply the continuous evolution of the universe. Natural selection then must apply to chemistry and physics as well.
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Dory wrote:I am rather beginning to suspect that even chemical evolution was possible due to physical evolution first, just like the biological evolution was enabled after the chemical evolution. That is to say, perhaps there was a physical evolutionary process (the coming together of subsubsubparticles to create a stable substance known as atom), that had kept evolving until what we decided to define as biology, is in fact simply the continuous evolution of the universe. Natural selection then must apply to chemistry and physics as well.
if the presence of one molecule makes the formation of another one like it more possible then molecules could be thought of as 'evolving '




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Replicating.
It's only 'evolving' if the molecules are changing.
It's only 'evolving' if the molecules are changing.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Yeah first replicate then that changes conditions or templates and available substrates so different molecules are formed later in response to the original types ...not exactly like evolution but a process with similar effects ?The Mad Hatter wrote:Replicating.
It's only 'evolving' if the molecules are changing.




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
The universe is a complex system with emergent dynamics. That is all.Feck wrote:Yeah first replicate then that changes conditions or templates and available substrates so different molecules are formed later in response to the original types ...not exactly like evolution but a process with similar effects ?The Mad Hatter wrote:Replicating.
It's only 'evolving' if the molecules are changing.

[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
We're going to have to be a whole lot smarter to figure this out.Psychoserenity wrote:The universe is a complex system with emergent dynamics. That is all.Feck wrote:Yeah first replicate then that changes conditions or templates and available substrates so different molecules are formed later in response to the original types ...not exactly like evolution but a process with similar effects ?The Mad Hatter wrote:Replicating.
It's only 'evolving' if the molecules are changing.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51266
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
This is what I always thought. Elsewhere in the universe you will still find critters with exoskeletons and some with spines.Mr P wrote:However life started it's still likely to be down to chemistry, the same rules will still apply wherever the origin lies.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
The problem is I'm not at all sure we know all the rules. I seriously doubt we have it all shushed after only a couple of centuries.Tero wrote:This is what I always thought. Elsewhere in the universe you will still find critters with exoskeletons and some with spines.Mr P wrote:However life started it's still likely to be down to chemistry, the same rules will still apply wherever the origin lies.
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
We don't have it sussed out here, let alone out there in the Universe.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: How to really screw up abiogenisis research.
Ed Zachery.The Mad Hatter wrote:We don't have it sussed out here, let alone out there in the Universe.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests