No, I was making the point that, so far, your 'evidences' have had no logical connection with the existence of allah. I'm not saying a teacup is intelligent, because you've yet to show evidence of any 'intelligence'.mandelson wrote:that is so laughable mate. are you seriously saying a teacup is intelligent?Psychoserenity:
Well I must say, the first two were truly excellent. - But they did both have a tiny little problem that I think might have been mentioned a few times in the previous thread; they were no more evidence for allah, than they were evidence for teacups in space.![]()
And how come you're ignoring my pleas to hear the rest of the 'evidences' as soon as possible?
Psychoserenity wrote: mandelson, just in case you missed it when the other thread was locked -
I think you should post all five at once, so we can point out how wrong they are, all in one go, and then get on with our lives.
But I suspect that you would prefer to drag this out for another twenty pages for each 'evidence'.
Prove me wrong.
Let's see if we can get this finished today, eh?
What if the fifth 'evidence' is the one that finally convinces us all? How can you justify holding that back from us?