















Would have been over my dead body penguin.SevenOfNine wrote:My former RDF staff colleagues may be distressed to hear it Doc, but for almost two years my finger was poised over the ban button. I wanted to ban every last idiotic climate change denier every time they posted.macdoc wrote:I'll add my thanks to RDF staff many of whom helped engineer positive changes in the board and put up with my climate change campaigns....![]()
Yay, another old fart reporting for duty!laklak wrote:There you are, Fras, I was getting worried about you.OFs now live in Fun Stuff / Games.
Just being honest! Apart from a wee bit of shenanigans of a few people being overly lax in the peer review of a few finds, the science of climate change is very solid. The evidence is much, much better than cigarette links to cancer, emphysema etc. And yet people stop smoking, because they know they are taking a grave risk. Not so climate change where some piddle-shit piece of anomalous data is said by the deluded god-botherers to invalidate the whole science. This means our future is in the hands of people like Robert Byers, and unfortunately those people vote. And big business does not want its much-billion dollar profits to drop by one cents, even if it is to save their greedy fat asses.Gallstones wrote:Would have been over my dead body penguin.SevenOfNine wrote:My former RDF staff colleagues may be distressed to hear it Doc, but for almost two years my finger was poised over the ban button. I wanted to ban every last idiotic climate change denier every time they posted.macdoc wrote:I'll add my thanks to RDF staff many of whom helped engineer positive changes in the board and put up with my climate change campaigns....![]()
Even though DarwinsBulldog may not have gone through the correct procedure when deciding to ban Andrew as a Troll, I feel it was justified and he would have received a consensus if the available mods had been polledDurro wrote: The staff put a lot of time and effort into running the place and approached their duties with diligence and impartiality. Sometimes the Mod discussions behind the scenes were spirited, even confrontational, but at the end of the day, we worked together to do the best we could allow people to express their opinions and themselves within a fair interpretation of the rules. We occasionally may have got it wrong, but most of the time amends were quickly made and for the most part, the decisions made about moderation were considered and impartial and involved multiple moderator input.
I totally agree, the man can fucking write!Mr.Samsa wrote:Even though DarwinsBulldog may not have gone through the correct procedure when deciding to ban Andrew as a Troll, I feel it was justified and he would have received a consensus if the available mods had been polledDurro wrote: The staff put a lot of time and effort into running the place and approached their duties with diligence and impartiality. Sometimes the Mod discussions behind the scenes were spirited, even confrontational, but at the end of the day, we worked together to do the best we could allow people to express their opinions and themselves within a fair interpretation of the rules. We occasionally may have got it wrong, but most of the time amends were quickly made and for the most part, the decisions made about moderation were considered and impartial and involved multiple moderator input.![]()
![]()
But good post Durro, I agree with it all
Nahhhhh. Fuck 'em. It's their loss, not mine.truthinScience wrote:Durro,
If you haven't already, do you plan on posting your thread concerning your experiences in Saudi Arabia? It's an enjoyable read and I'd hate to see that disappear!
I am booked in and ready!Kiwi wrote:Hello all I have come here after seeing this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDSaDVYvg_c
Well this is going to make the Melbourne conference even more interesting. Is there any plan for ex RDFers to meet for a beer ? I will be there.
Many thanks to the mods (and rockers) over the years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests