Just brain fog from the meds then --wrong thread! I'm glad you're doing well Mac.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-promises-e ... 09231.htmlIn 2019, the Migration Policy Institute estimated that 5.5 million children under age 18 lived with at least one parent in the country illegally in 2019, representing 7% of the U.S. child population. The vast majority of those children were U.S. citizens.
But some have argued that the 1898 case clearly applied to children born of parents who are both legal immigrants to America but that it's less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status or, for example, who come for a short-term like a tourist visa.
“That is the leading case on this. In fact, it’s the only case on this,” said Andrew Arthur, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies.
He gave a lot more details in a 2023 post on his campaign website. In it, he said he would issue an executive order the first day of his presidency, making it clear that federal agencies “require that at least one parent be a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident for their future children to become automatic U.S. citizens.”
Trump wrote that the executive order would make clear that children of people in the U.S. illegally “should not be issued passports, Social Security numbers, or be eligible for certain taxpayer funded welfare benefits.”
This would almost certainly end up in litigation.
I'm still not sure how to approach this one. I think by spiritual here you're referring to something like ethos and I can probably agree, as I do tend to see the issue as being something like an identity crisis.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2024 7:26 pmCould we call this a kind of 'spiritual crisis' then - both at a personal level and at the community level?Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:44 pmIt sounds interesting. The bias I carry into these sorts of discussions is the belief that there is an enormous disconnect between how we think of ourselves, and how we are, especially in groups. I can accept that we have created systems which work against our best interest. But when you consider our best interest to be some version of a thriving healthy individual, then I would caution that we carry within us enough baggage to ensure that many people never realize this, regardless of how we "choose" to organize societies. That's never an argument in favor of the status quo though; it's just an observation, I think.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2024 9:23 amPerhapsSean Hayden wrote:Is the assumption that capitalism is bolted on, and once removed a healthier more natural state of affairs can be allowed to thrive? Because I suspect being human just ain’t all that conducive to thriving communities, at least not in the sense most people have in mind when they say that sort of thing. But maybe capitalism has just warped ma mind.
I think his thrust isn't so much that capitalism bad (tho that's my take!), but that Society is how we care for each other and ourselves, and Economy is just the material means by which we do that. When Economy doesn't allow us to do the care Society, and therefore us, start to break down. He uses the idea of perfection to examine what it is we really want and need to lead healthier more fulfilling lives.
Yeah, 'ethos' and 'identity' are good terms.Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:01 pmI'm still not sure how to approach this one. I think by spiritual here you're referring to something like ethos and I can probably agree, as I do tend to see the issue as being something like an identity crisis.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2024 7:26 pm...
Could we call this a kind of 'spiritual crisis' then - both at a personal level and at the community level?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests