I think many of them thought that they'd just stroll in, take the chambers, line up the culprits, and then El Trumpo would swing in (because he said he was definitely going to come with them) with his entourage and say some magic words and the election would have been nullified. Others just thought that whatever happened it's better than democracy. And then there were pipebombers and the ex- and wannabe- military types who scoped the building and coordinated their actions to stretch the thin blue line of the capital police, breach the defenses by force, and lead the mob to where they wanted them to be.Seabass wrote:What Trump did over the months leading up to the 6th and culminating with his incitement on the 6th was what political scientists and historians refer to as an attempted self-coup.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-coup
What his horde of fascist morons did on the 6th was an insurrection. There were some elements within the crowd who appeared to have had the intent to commit acts of terrorism.
The insurrection's apologists focus on those who were swept up in the emotion of the thing and carried along on the day, as if only they were present, without looking at what they were swept up in or who or what had organised the event and motivated them.
Maybe most of the mob didn't have a clear idea of what was happening or exactly what the outcome would be, but they'd been speeched at and geed up hard for two hours and knew exactly why they had travelled to Washington: they were there to 'stop the steal' and to "take back control of our nation" l, and they were going to have to undergo "trial by combat" and to "fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore." The objective of the day from Republican inside the Capitol to supporters and flunkies outside was to overturn the election and maintain Trump as president. That's insurrection.
The insurrection's apologists point to the fact that the mob didn't appear to have a clear plan and that they didn't succeed as evidence that there was no insurrection. That's true. They didn't succeed and Trump didn't get to keep his job. But only an idiot, a liar, or a deluded fanboi would try and maintain that that's not what Trump et al intended and what they assembled and motivated the mob towards. Regardless of their success or failure what other possible outcome could there have been?
It's pretty laughable that Trump is now citing how the constitution has justified his innocence at his impeachment after all that he did to negate the constitution in the run up to the 6th and on the day. Just as an election is only good when he wins, the constitution is only good when it gets him what he wants.