She is not an actor by trade, but she is a psychology professor and has three degrees in psychology, and it showed in her presentation. She did not present her testimony in her own voice - she pretended to be a little girl, meek and wilting, when she is a capable and accomplished person. That's not her voice, and her body language was designed to be the "I'm little and I'm pretty" presentation.Tero wrote: ↑Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:01 pm
She is not an actor. She read her letter in her own voice. In fact, she was in control. she also is not seeking a job. She has little to gain, she can continue in her job no matter who becomes judge.
You are not recognizing that your boy failed. No FBI report needed. He does not have the qualifications for the job. His speech was pathetic.
She was in control, because nobody challenged her a bit. The prosecutor scored points through careful, easy questions, appearing never to test Dr. Ford's assertions. No cross examination feel at all. It had to be that way, because any cross examination or focus on the holes in her story would be plastered in the media as some sort of bullying of a victim.
On the other hand, Kavanaugh, the "white male" who should have "shut up" anyway, he was accused of being a black-out drunk, serial abuser of women, and not only a rapist but also a gang rapist who participates in conspiracies to drug and rape women, and he had the quotes in his yearbook brought up for explanation. Everyone "understands" why Dr. Ford would have mistakes and failures of memory, but Judge Kavanaugh is expected to have perfect recall of an event he denied ever happened. LOL.
Uh oh! Kavanaugh drank in high school, that corroborates Dr. Ford's story! He was drinking and doesn't remember jumping on Dr. Ford! (paraphrasing several prominent news sources). There was no reporting that Dr. Ford was a big drinker in high school and therefore she might be misremembering the events in question which did not involve Dr. Ford at all. To do that would be victim blaming.