Catcher in the Rye

Post Reply
User avatar
Transgirlofnofaith
Everyone's favourite loudmouth Furry narcissist.
Posts: 1319
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:09 am
Contact:
Contact Transgirlofnofaith

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Transgirlofnofaith » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:50 pm

Marmaduke wrote:Right - "expounding on the themes quite well" was saying that it is "one of the greatest books of the 20th century". :coffee:
Manofnofaith wrote: This is just a pathetic and honestly idiotic dismissal of one of the greatest books of the twentieth century. I will never again pay attention to any of your recommendations for books. Your opinions on the subject of literature are just fucking worthless if you are this dismissive of The Catcher In The Rye.
Whaaaa? I remember writing something to that extent. Holy deletion of part of your reply, Batman! What I wrote, before I fucked up and erased it, was that the book is basically about how life isn't always nice or interesting, and about the end of childhood and coming to terms with the death of adventure as something that may be around every corner. Fuck, my bad. I really should be more careful to make sure I leave everything that I think I did when I'm composing a reply. :lay:
Under (re)construction
Top
Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:
Contact Lozzer

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Lozzer » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:11 pm

Manofnofaith wrote:
Lozzer wrote:There's only one word to describe this entire book--WOW, just wow.

I'm astounded at how this can even be considered a classic, let alone a piece literature at all. Its probably the most tedious trash I've ever had to read. I got all the way to chapter 5. I only read it until that chapter because I expected something to actually happen after the first or second chapter but nothing did. I skipped to the last page, where I found some closure. Turns out, nothing happens at all. Its good to know one isn't being presumptuous.

The narrator is supposed to be 16 years old, this doesn't justify the author implementing the word 'goddamn' in every sentence. Its repetitive as well as irritating. Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn could pull it off, and he did--but not J. D. Salinger. Supposedly, this book is supposed to read with a teenage mentality, well I am a teenager and it has to be said that at 16 I could have wrote a book far better than this.And as boring as my life might be at times, its allot more eventful that the protagonists.

I can't stand overrated books, particularly this one. I've put it where it rightfully belongs (next to the Kite Runner).

Wow.
This is just a pathetic and honestly idiotic dismissal of one of the greatest books of the twentieth century. I will never again pay attention to any of your recommendations for books. Your opinions on the subject of literature are just fucking worthless if you are this dismissive of The Catcher In The Rye. Maybe you'd like something with more explosions, bad diologue, and 2D, boring, sterotypical characters. For you, I reccomend anything by this guy:

Image

:tdown:

So you're dismissive of the dismissive because you find the said dismissal, dismissive? I'm not sure what you'd recommend, but I'm not that into the works of Dr. Seuss.

I just happen to find the Catcher in the Rye incredibly boring and uneventful, and Its a little annoying to find that it was crap after all the praise its received. Id read it, and try harder, maybe even finished it one day--but I wont be able to reconcile those lost minutes.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee
Top
Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:
Contact Lozzer

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Lozzer » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:16 pm

Manofnofaith wrote:
Marmaduke wrote:Right - "expounding on the themes quite well" was saying that it is "one of the greatest books of the 20th century". :coffee:
Manofnofaith wrote: This is just a pathetic and honestly idiotic dismissal of one of the greatest books of the twentieth century. I will never again pay attention to any of your recommendations for books. Your opinions on the subject of literature are just fucking worthless if you are this dismissive of The Catcher In The Rye.
Whaaaa? I remember writing something to that extent. Holy deletion of part of your reply, Batman! What I wrote, before I fucked up and erased it, was that the book is basically about how life isn't always nice or interesting, and about the end of childhood and coming to terms with the death of adventure as something that may be around every corner. Fuck, my bad. I really should be more careful to make sure I leave everything that I think I did when I'm composing a reply. :lay:

I'll think you'll find many books of a decent quality in that genre, it just so happens that Catcher in the Rye isn't one of them (for me anyway).
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee
Top
User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:
Contact Mysturji

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Mysturji » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:01 pm

Worst pile of shit I ever read in my life. The main character doesn't have one single redeeming feature, and spends the entire book moaning about how shitty everyone else is... because they're exactly like him, but he doesn't see it. He's a complete fucking idiot and he learns nothing by the end of the book, he does not change in the slightest. The only characters in the whole book that are not complete shits are 2 nuns (whom he takes the piss out of for a page & a half) and his little sister who is about 4 and cute and is only in one short scene.
I forced myself to read the whole fucking thing, because it's a classic, right? It must get better!
Bollocks! Now I know why every other pshyco killer always has a dog-eared copy of that book in his pocket when he gets arrested: After reading that putrid piece of wank, I sure as hell wanted to kill someone. Like the author.
BTW, is that cunt still alive? I have a bone to pick with him.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.
Top
User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:
Contact FBM

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by FBM » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:08 pm

Mysturji wrote:Worst pile of shit I ever read in my life...
The worst you've ever read, maybe. But surely not the worst thing ever written...
bible.gif
51JWMRB04PL__SS500_.jpg
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
Top
User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:
Contact Mysturji

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Mysturji » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:11 pm

FBM wrote:
Mysturji wrote:Worst pile of shit I ever read in my life...
The worst you've ever read, maybe. But surely not the worst thing ever written...
Agreed.
bible.gif
51JWMRB04PL__SS500_.jpg
:shock:
Fuck me! That looks like Dev! :hilarious:
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.
Top
User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:
Contact FBM

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by FBM » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:17 pm

Mysturji wrote:
FBM wrote:
Mysturji wrote:Worst pile of shit I ever read in my life...
The worst you've ever read, maybe. But surely not the worst thing ever written...
Agreed.
bible.gif
51JWMRB04PL__SS500_.jpg
:shock:
Fuck me! That looks like Dev! :hilarious:
I wouldn't know, but I don't think he'd appreciate the association... :?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
Top
User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by charlou » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:55 am

Introducing the Devogway we know and love Image
Image


Back on topic, and Catcher in the Rye is not a book I'm inclined to read any time soon as I have stacks of other books higher up my list of must reads ... So many books, so little time ...
no fences
Top
User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:
Contact lordpasternack

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by lordpasternack » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:07 pm

Charlou wrote:Back on topic, and Catcher in the Rye is not a book I'm inclined to read any time soon as I have stacks of other books higher up my list of must reads ... So many books, so little time ...
It's a very short book... :dono:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.
Top
User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:
Contact Mysturji

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Mysturji » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:02 pm

lordpasternack wrote:
Charlou wrote:Back on topic, and Catcher in the Rye is not a book I'm inclined to read any time soon as I have stacks of other books higher up my list of must reads ... So many books, so little time ...
It's a very short book... :dono:
But it seems so much longer. :yawn:
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.
Top
User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:
Contact Xamonas Chegwé

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:30 pm

I read it when I was about 19. I don't remember a great deal about it but I remember that liked the atmosphere of the book more than anything. I have read a little more Salinger since and it has been OK but nothing Earth-shattering.

I have been meaning to reread Catcher for decades. But there's just so much else I need to read - and so much bollocks I need to post here!! :dono:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Top
User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:
Contact Cormac

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Cormac » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:40 pm

Lozzer wrote:There's only one word to describe this entire book--WOW, just wow.

I'm astounded at how this can even be considered a classic, let alone a piece literature at all. Its probably the most tedious trash I've ever had to read. I got all the way to chapter 5. I only read it until that chapter because I expected something to actually happen after the first or second chapter but nothing did. I skipped to the last page, where I found some closure. Turns out, nothing happens at all. Its good to know one isn't being presumptuous.

The narrator is supposed to be 16 years old, this doesn't justify the author implementing the word 'goddamn' in every sentence. Its repetitive as well as irritating. Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn could pull it off, and he did--but not J. D. Salinger. Supposedly, this book is supposed to read with a teenage mentality, well I am a teenager and it has to be said that at 16 I could have wrote a book far better than this.And as boring as my life might be at times, its allot more eventful that the protagonists.

I can't stand overrated books, particularly this one. I've put it where it rightfully belongs (next to the Kite Runner).


Wow.
That is cos Huck is a stone cold cool motherfucker, whereas Holden is an arsehole. (Or, as he might whinge himself - a "phony").

Huck on the other hand smokes corncob pipes, has a bowie knife, explores caves, helps slaves to escape, and lives in an empty barrel.

(Remember what other famous person in history lived in a barrel?)
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Top
User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:
Contact Cormac

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Cormac » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:42 pm

FBM wrote:I've read that it helps to keep in mind that the narration is actually Holden talking to his psychiatrist or therapist, as the story reveals that he was put under psychiatric care. It was hard to pinpoint a single point that the book was trying to make, and you have to get into analyzing imagery and word choice and such, all of which makes it too much work, IMO. It was a worthwhile read for me, but nothing I'd rave about, exactly.
Like Ulysses and Finnegan's Wake by Joyce. Utter bollox.

His earlier stuff was excellent, but then his ego masturbation took over, and he began to write fuck all.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Top
User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:
Contact Cormac

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Cormac » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:45 pm

Manofnofaith wrote:
AshtonBlack wrote:MoNF, you've been as dismissive of Lozzer as the he is about a book, do you see the problem there?
Well, despite your framed question, there is no problem. When he writes shit like this:
Lozzer wrote:Its probably the most tedious trash I've ever had to read.
He's just asking to have the piss taken out of his review. If you read my response again, you'll notice that I was attacking lozzer's opinion, not lozzer himself. I was not, despite your claim, attacking lozzer. Do you see the problem in your opinion there? I have the right on here to say someone's opinion is shit, and it's only a problem if a member attacks someone personally. Go read the rules. :evil:
Sorry to do this but:
:ohthedrama:

It was only an opinion about a book for goodness sake. :console:
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Top
User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:
Contact Cormac

Re: Catcher in the Rye

Post by Cormac » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:48 pm

Mysturji wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
Charlou wrote:Back on topic, and Catcher in the Rye is not a book I'm inclined to read any time soon as I have stacks of other books higher up my list of must reads ... So many books, so little time ...
It's a very short book... :dono:
But it seems so much longer. :yawn:
Yes.

Reading that book is like slowly inserting hot needles in ones eyes, and under one's fingernails and toenails...
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Literature & The Arts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests