Politics
Eight Members of Congress Arrested During D.C. Immigration Rally
Oct. 8, 2013 5:17pm Oliver Darcy
Eight members of Congress were arrested during a Tuesday immigration rally on Washington, D.C.’s National Mall.
Several House Democrats sat in the middle of Independence Avenue and blocked rush hour traffic, according to the Star Tribune.
The representatives, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Rep. Al Green (D-TX), Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Rep. Jan Schawkowsky (D-IL) and Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY), were then arrested by U.S. Capitol Police, spokeswoman Kimberly Schneider confirmed to TheBlaze.
The congressmen were charged with “crowding, obstructing, and incommoding” under D.C. Code 22-1307 and will be processed by the U.S. Capitol Police at 67 K Street, SW.
Tuesday’s rally was organized by a group called Camino Americano and was aimed at urging Congress to pass immigration reform allowing individuals who are illegally in the U.S. to apply for citizenship. The demonstration took place on the “legally closed” National Mall, but was allowed by the National Parks Service because it was considered a rally guarded by the First Amendment.
Here is a video of the arrests, posted to Rangel’s official Twitter account:
Dems obstruct in a new way.
Dems obstruct in a new way.
I wonder if Congress was adjourned at the time? If not, I believe they were arrested in violation of the Constitution.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer
- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse. - Location: Nottingham UK
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? 

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing

Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74306
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
THE DEMOCRATS ARE A GIANT BOWEL OBSTRUCTION IN THE RECTUM OF AMERICA!
NURSE, PREPARE THE RUBBER TUBING!
NURSE, PREPARE THE RUBBER TUBING!
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
NO THE OTHER RUBBER THING NOT MY PERSONAL ONE!
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican?

Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
No, they just want different government. Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?Tyrannical wrote:Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican?![]()
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing
Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41185
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Maybe the tea party is, but not the mainland GOP.Tyrannical wrote:Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican?![]()
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
From Reagan on, there have been 20 years of Republicans and 12 1/2 years of Democrats, so the comparison is bollocks. Obama has taken military action in Afghanistan (escalating the War monumentally), and also fought bombed and sent troops to Pakistan and Yemen. He sent troops to the Central African Republic/Congo/South Sudan, he bombed and sent troops to Libya (12,000 troops to Libya), troops to Egypt, Uganda, Obama has sent arms to the Syrian rebels. Obama is sending troops to about 30-40 African countries, as a matter of fact (the "Dagger Brigade"). Drone strikes in Somalia. Troops to Jordan to put on Syrian border. Troops to Turkey to put on Syrian border. Troops to Chad. Troops to Mali to help the French in Operation Serval.Robert_S wrote:
Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
And I say President Rand Paul is the answer to small government, ending the war on drugs, and ending military adventurismRobert_S wrote:No, they just want different government. Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?Tyrannical wrote:Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican?![]()
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing
Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Tyrannical wrote:
And I say President Rand Paul is the answer to small government, ending the war on drugs, and ending military adventurism
All he has to do is crown himself Emperor...

- Collector1337
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
- About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
- Location: US Mother Fucking A
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Name one Libertarian who agrees with that. Just one.Robert_S wrote:Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?
I'll wait.

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
Collector1337 wrote:Name one Libertarian who agrees with that. Just one.Robert_S wrote:Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?
I'll wait.
I think it might have been black democrats that asked for the war on drugs, I know they were originally behind the minimum sentencing laws for crack.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.
The drug problem itself is a government conspiracy against the black man.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests