Dems obstruct in a new way.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Seth » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:54 am

I wonder if Congress was adjourned at the time? If not, I believe they were arrested in violation of the Constitution.
Politics
Eight Members of Congress Arrested During D.C. Immigration Rally
Oct. 8, 2013 5:17pm Oliver Darcy

Eight members of Congress were arrested during a Tuesday immigration rally on Washington, D.C.’s National Mall.

Several House Democrats sat in the middle of Independence Avenue and blocked rush hour traffic, according to the Star Tribune.

The representatives, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Rep. Al Green (D-TX), Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Rep. Jan Schawkowsky (D-IL) and Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY), were then arrested by U.S. Capitol Police, spokeswoman Kimberly Schneider confirmed to TheBlaze.

The congressmen were charged with “crowding, obstructing, and incommoding” under D.C. Code 22-1307 and will be processed by the U.S. Capitol Police at 67 K Street, SW.

Tuesday’s rally was organized by a group called Camino Americano and was aimed at urging Congress to pass immigration reform allowing individuals who are illegally in the U.S. to apply for citizenship. The demonstration took place on the “legally closed” National Mall, but was allowed by the National Parks Service because it was considered a rally guarded by the First Amendment.

Here is a video of the arrests, posted to Rangel’s official Twitter account:
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:58 am

Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9220
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by macdoc » Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:35 am

Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74306
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by JimC » Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:02 am

THE DEMOCRATS ARE A GIANT BOWEL OBSTRUCTION IN THE RECTUM OF AMERICA!

NURSE, PREPARE THE RUBBER TUBING!
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21890
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by tattuchu » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:21 am

NO THE OTHER RUBBER THING NOT MY PERSONAL ONE!
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:26 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? :tea:
:thinks:
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing :eddy:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Robert_S » Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:07 am

Tyrannical wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? :tea:
:thinks:
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing :eddy:
No, they just want different government. Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?

Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41186
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Svartalf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:26 am

Tyrannical wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? :tea:
:thinks:
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing :eddy:
Maybe the tea party is, but not the mainland GOP.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:56 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?
From Reagan on, there have been 20 years of Republicans and 12 1/2 years of Democrats, so the comparison is bollocks. Obama has taken military action in Afghanistan (escalating the War monumentally), and also fought bombed and sent troops to Pakistan and Yemen. He sent troops to the Central African Republic/Congo/South Sudan, he bombed and sent troops to Libya (12,000 troops to Libya), troops to Egypt, Uganda, Obama has sent arms to the Syrian rebels. Obama is sending troops to about 30-40 African countries, as a matter of fact (the "Dagger Brigade"). Drone strikes in Somalia. Troops to Jordan to put on Syrian border. Troops to Turkey to put on Syrian border. Troops to Chad. Troops to Mali to help the French in Operation Serval.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:24 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Seth, I'm curious. How can you be both anti-government and pro-republican? :tea:
:thinks:
Republican seems to be the strongest political vehicle for limited government, so your question is confusing :eddy:
No, they just want different government. Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?

Which presidents have sent more US troops out on foreign soil in the past three decades?
And I say President Rand Paul is the answer to small government, ending the war on drugs, and ending military adventurism :prof:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by piscator » Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:48 am

Tyrannical wrote:
And I say President Rand Paul is the answer to small government, ending the war on drugs, and ending military adventurism :prof:


All he has to do is crown himself Emperor... :shiver:

User avatar
Collector1337
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
Location: US Mother Fucking A
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Collector1337 » Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:07 am

Robert_S wrote:Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?
Name one Libertarian who agrees with that. Just one.

I'll wait. :coffee:
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by piscator » Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:24 am

Bob.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:25 am

Collector1337 wrote:
Robert_S wrote:Reagan launched that War on Drugs that still erodes our civil liberties to this day, remember?
Name one Libertarian who agrees with that. Just one.

I'll wait. :coffee:

I think it might have been black democrats that asked for the war on drugs, I know they were originally behind the minimum sentencing laws for crack.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dems obstruct in a new way.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:11 pm

The drug problem itself is a government conspiracy against the black man.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests