The case against porn
The case against porn
Look what's happening in the UK.
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/06/1 ... d-of-2013/
First they came to register your guns, then they came to take your guns, then after you were defenceless they came to take your porn.
But I will not allow that. If they want to take my porn, they have to take it from my sticky dead hands.
Not without reason does the American constitution say: A well erected and ejaculating militia being necessary for the defence of a free state, the people have the right to bare arms and breasts and twats and cocks.
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/06/1 ... d-of-2013/
First they came to register your guns, then they came to take your guns, then after you were defenceless they came to take your porn.
But I will not allow that. If they want to take my porn, they have to take it from my sticky dead hands.
Not without reason does the American constitution say: A well erected and ejaculating militia being necessary for the defence of a free state, the people have the right to bare arms and breasts and twats and cocks.
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
If you read the article you will have to opt in rather than opt out. I'm for it myself. I will of course be opting in!
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
They should make it like a switch -- if you want your internetz filtered you can buy it with a filter. If you want your internetz unflitered; get the unfiltered kind. I wonder if that's possible.NineBerry wrote:Look what's happening in the UK.
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/06/1 ... d-of-2013/
First they came to register your guns, then they came to take your guns, then after you were defenceless they came to take your porn.
But I will not allow that. If they want to take my porn, they have to take it from my sticky dead hands.
Not without reason does the American constitution say: A well erected and ejaculating militia being necessary for the defence of a free state, the people have the right to bare arms and breasts and twats and cocks.
I could see workplaces that buy internet services from an ISP would like to be able to buy the limited kind. But, then when you're buying directly from an ISP provider, shouldn't you be able to get the unfiltered variety?
Re: The case against porn
Well, opting in will only work for a few hours. And your other household members will be informed of your opting in activity. So not only will your internet provider know when and how often you are a naughty boy, your wife / husband / parents will also know.Rum wrote:If you read the article you will have to opt in rather than opt out. I'm for it myself. I will of course be opting in!
Imagine how this is for an 18 year old still living with their parents.
Re: The case against porn
Additionally who is going to make the list of what is pornography and what isn't? How can you be certain Wikileaks won't be on that list very soon?
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
The crux is that the opt-in the govt wants will opt-itself-out again the next day, and you'll have to opt-in again.Rum wrote:If you read the article you will have to opt in rather than opt out. I'm for it myself. I will of course be opting in!
However...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22934600
So it's still up in the air.UK ISPs have rejected calls by David Cameron's adviser on preventing the sexualisation of childhood to impose parental filters for adult content as a default setting.
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
- Collector1337
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
- About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
- Location: US Mother Fucking A
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
The UK disgusts me.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
Collector1337 wrote:The UK disgusts me.

http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
Re: The case against porn
I love the UK. Always great to visit there. 

- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
It's OK. 

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Re: The case against porn
Once you get used to the Thought Police anyway.Bella Fortuna wrote:It's OK.

- cronus
- Black Market Analyst
- Posts: 18122
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
- About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
There's too much porn. It's a distraction. About time they called time on the smut. 

What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?
-
- Microagressor
- Posts: 19009
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
As an American, and a Texan to boot, I'm not troubled by thought police.


- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
They told me the UK is OK, it MUST be true.Ian wrote:Once you get used to the Thought Police anyway.Bella Fortuna wrote:It's OK.

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: The case against porn
I'm all for the opt-in system. In fact, I think they should extend it to all sorts of things.
Opt-in for political propeganda. Make it illegal to aim political opinions at the public, unless they have chosen it.
And opt-in for religious shit. Same thing, nobody is allowed to push it, unless you opt for it.
And commercials.
And nationalist propeganda, which in the UK takes the form of cosy little "news" items about how nice and popular and much-loved the royal family are.
Opt-in is great. It's not a restriction of freedom. It's freedom from stuff you didn't ask for.
Go for it !
Opt-in for political propeganda. Make it illegal to aim political opinions at the public, unless they have chosen it.
And opt-in for religious shit. Same thing, nobody is allowed to push it, unless you opt for it.
And commercials.
And nationalist propeganda, which in the UK takes the form of cosy little "news" items about how nice and popular and much-loved the royal family are.
Opt-in is great. It's not a restriction of freedom. It's freedom from stuff you didn't ask for.
Go for it !
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests