You have a swimming pool? In the UK you'd be prosecuted for hoarding water.laklak wrote:I figure the 11,000 gallons of water in the swimming pool will help. If I run out I'll just shoot looters and drain their blood.
![[icon_drunk.gif] :drunk:](./images/smilies/icon_drunk.gif)
You have a swimming pool? In the UK you'd be prosecuted for hoarding water.laklak wrote:I figure the 11,000 gallons of water in the swimming pool will help. If I run out I'll just shoot looters and drain their blood.
Did you register your string trimmer, and have you taken your hammer safety course? How many citizens are actually competent to handle a hammer, after all?laklak wrote:I've also got two machetes, a lawn mower, string trimmer, an axe, a couple of saws and multiple hammers. Not to mention firearms.
Fuck, I'd be done for hoarding AND terrorism!
Don't be silly if you leave it full we will prosecute you for endangering burglars lives (someone did sue the council for making it to easy to break into , they broke they back diving into it when it was closed and last I herd they at least partially won)Coito ergo sum wrote:You have a swimming pool? In the UK you'd be prosecuted for hoarding water.laklak wrote:I figure the 11,000 gallons of water in the swimming pool will help. If I run out I'll just shoot looters and drain their blood.
Dexter always confused me, isnt having forensics linked to the police a clash of interests (obviously not in the kill everyone and cover it up sort of way). Forensics duty is to the courts (and the 'truth') not to police especially ones they go out drinking/murdering withlaklak wrote:Same sort of silly shit has happened over here, so the best way to deal with it is shoot them and dump them 40 miles offshore. If you chop them up first it's easier, like Dexter does.
You know Dexter never uses a gun, and has this magic drug that knocks someone out 100% of the time in a fraction of a second!laklak wrote:It's one of my favorite shows. I see it as a how-to video.
I think over here the forensic people are part of the police force, but I could be wrong.
I don't think you are allowed swimming pools in the UK, as the government can't protect the population from drowning.Coito ergo sum wrote:You have a swimming pool? In the UK you'd be prosecuted for hoarding water.laklak wrote:I figure the 11,000 gallons of water in the swimming pool will help. If I run out I'll just shoot looters and drain their blood.
Well thought out. The problem with fleeing is that if you do it too soon, you waste your resources, but if you do it too late, you might not get out at all.Coito ergo sum wrote:Thinking about this, it occurred to me that I don't really want to hunker down where I live right now, if there is some sort of massive civil unrest. I don't have a very good defensive position in my suburban home, with wife and kid. We don't even have a fence around the house, and my locks and home security system works great now, but if the shit really hits the fan, it'll all be useless. Even a gun or two would be only useful to get me outta Dodge, so to speak.Ian wrote:I love hearing Seth wax on about how well-prepared he is to hold back the proletarian cannibal hordes after some apocalypse happens. I can just feel the enlightenment and humanity wash over me.
So, my plan right now is to have enough food and fuel to get me somewhere else. Only, I can't think of a good place to go in that instance.
I think my best option is to try to organize the local community, so that the local community as a whole can band together to help each other peacefully survive.
No, not at all. It's "rational analysis and conclusions that the government is simply INCAPABLE of providing for mass numbers of people dislocated by civil strife, natural disaster or war.Pappa wrote:Unless I missed a bunch of posts (quite likely), I didn't get that at all from this thread. It's seemed more like "Government intervention in the face of adversity versus the stand alone every man for himself individualistic approach".Rum wrote:Not sure how you reach that conclusion. A theme that comes through in this thread is cooperation in the face of adversity versus the stand alone every man for himself individualistic approach.Coito ergo sum wrote:Congratulations, Rum, you've won the red herring of the day award. Keep up the good work.Rum wrote:Every man for himself - the American dream at its best..
I don't think there's anything wrong with taking personal responsibility for ensuring you'd be prepared for some calamity.
CES wrote:
You're like Blanche Dubois, saying "Whoever you are, I've always depended on the kindness of strangers," while the kindly psychiatrist leads her away to the mental institution.
There are currently no regulations specific to home swimming pools, thank you for bringing it up and I will write to my MPrEvolutionist wrote:I don't think you are allowed swimming pools in the UK, as the government can't protect the population from drowning.Coito ergo sum wrote:You have a swimming pool? In the UK you'd be prosecuted for hoarding water.laklak wrote:I figure the 11,000 gallons of water in the swimming pool will help. If I run out I'll just shoot looters and drain their blood.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests