-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:29 am
Făkünamę wrote:
Precisely. Shall is still used in more rarefied discussion in the presumptive subjunctive form and, most commonly, in the inquisitive subjunctive.
Spoiler that!!!

"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Tyrannical » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:44 am
No mention of "shalt" yet? It's the second-person singular simple present form of shall, whatever the hell that means.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:52 am
Tyrannical wrote:No mention of "shalt" yet? It's the second-person singular simple present form of shall, whatever the hell that means.
As in, "Thou shalt not..." Maybe it's limited to the command form.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
SteveB
- Nibbler
- Posts: 7506
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
- About me: The more you change the less you feel
- Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by SteveB » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:11 am
Why am I reading this?

Twit, twat,
twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged!

-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Tyrannical » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:13 am
SteveB wrote:Why am I reading this?

Because it is one one the more interesting grammar Nazi topics.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
SteveB
- Nibbler
- Posts: 7506
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
- About me: The more you change the less you feel
- Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by SteveB » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:14 am
Interesting to whom....or is it who? Ahhh!

Twit, twat,
twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged!

-
Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
-
Contact:
Post
by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:15 am
SteveB wrote:Why am I reading this?

Lack of will?
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
- Location: Scotlifornia
-
Contact:
Post
by Bella Fortuna » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:16 am
Screw it. The new word incorporating both is shill. Yes, I know that's already a word, and I don't care. We're taking it now. You shill use it and like it!
-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Tyrannical » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:22 am
FBM wrote:Tyrannical wrote:No mention of "shalt" yet? It's the second-person singular simple present form of shall, whatever the hell that means.
As in, "Thou shalt not..." Maybe it's limited to the command form.
I miss Thee, Thou, and Dost.
Prithee tell me Willis, of what dost thou speak?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:33 am
That reminds me, I need to refill my shalt shaker.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer

- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:48 am
Whoever heard of Shall-I-Am?

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:54 am
Free Shall vs Determinism...
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer

- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:55 am
Willots?

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
-
Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40994
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
-
Contact:
Post
by Svartalf » Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:07 am
John_fi_Skye wrote:When it's the "normal" future tense ("future indicative active"), "shall" is first person, while "will" is second and third.
"I shall try it tomorrow."
"You will find this the best way to do it."
"He will start painting the house on Tuesday."
When it's implying determination that something must (or must not) happen, it's the other way round.
"I will never allow it."
"You shall do as I say."
"They shall not pass."
Having said all that, it's true that "shall" is indeed fading out, and becoming archaic.
That's how I was taught it too, though I must admit that the teacher was old already in the mid 80s, and that I had to wait till after I left secondary education for the subject to even get broached... before then, "will" was the only way we were taught.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40994
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
-
Contact:
Post
by Svartalf » Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:08 am
John_fi_Skye wrote:Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I shall never stop using shall, e'en if the gates of Will yawn open before me.

Sometimes you sound so BRuTISH!


Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest