Connecticut (et al)
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41181
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Doing time for defending one's home and life is not what I call civilized
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: Connecticut (et al)
What if it's just some drunken ass that thinks it's his house in his drunken stupor.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41181
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
The "definition" used in the law has nothing to do with enhancing functionality, and even less with the weapon's usefulness in an "assault" role... much of the gun crime in the us is done with saturnday night specials.Făkünamę wrote:Incorrect. That's only NRA propaganda. It goes along with "scary black weapons". There are defining characteristics of an assault weapon and much enhanced functionality in an assault situation as a result of them. I've been over this in some detail.Svartalf wrote:"Assault weapon" is a stupid tag slapped on something to make the bleeding hearts feel good about restricting people's constitutional rights... it has nothing to do with assault rifles or other full auto capable weapons, or with reducing crime.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41181
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Darwin award.Făkünamę wrote:What if it's just some drunken ass that thinks it's his house in his drunken stupor.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: Connecticut (et al)
I've been over this. So..Svartalf wrote:The "definition" used in the law has nothing to do with enhancing functionality, and even less with the weapon's usefulness in an "assault" role... much of the gun crime in the us is done with saturnday night specials.Făkünamę wrote:Incorrect. That's only NRA propaganda. It goes along with "scary black weapons". There are defining characteristics of an assault weapon and much enhanced functionality in an assault situation as a result of them. I've been over this in some detail.Svartalf wrote:"Assault weapon" is a stupid tag slapped on something to make the bleeding hearts feel good about restricting people's constitutional rights... it has nothing to do with assault rifles or other full auto capable weapons, or with reducing crime.

- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Svartalf wrote:Doing time for defending one's home and life is not what I call civilized
No, but doing time for killing someone merely because he was a threat in your over-active imagination is very civilised.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Wumbologist
- I want a do-over
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
You're such a wet blanket.Blind groper wrote:Wumbo
If you did that in my country, which unlike the USA, is civilised in terms of guns, you would be arraigned for murder, and end up doing time. A long time.
Făkünamę wrote: Incorrect. That's only NRA propaganda. It goes along with "scary black weapons". There are defining characteristics of an assault weapon and much enhanced functionality in an assault situation as a result of them. I've been over this in some detail.
The weapon used by Anders Breivik to shoot 69 people was a Ruger Mini-14, a rifle which I also happen to own. It's never been banned by name or by feature in any assault weapons ban in the US, and was and still is legal to own in Norway as well. Of course, the media didn't shout up and down about the firearm used to kill 69 people in this case, because it wasn't a scary-looking black gun that is similar to a model used by the military. However, its functionality is essentially the same, as I can personally attest to from the time I've spent with mine at the range, and as clearly evidenced by its efficiency in Breivik's hands.

The one on top is labeled by some as an "assault weapon", the one on the bottom was used by Anders Breivik to kill 69 people. But please, go ahead and tell me more about how "assault weapons" are extra special dangerous because of the scary black paint and pistol grip.
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Been over this Wumbologist. I don't feel like repeating myself. Use the search function.
Incidentally, I agreed that the mini-14 with a high-capacity magazine should be banned as well. High cap mags have to go. Minimum 5 year federal prison sentence for anyone caught in possession of one, 10 years for possession of two, electric chair for possession of three or more.
Incidentally, I agreed that the mini-14 with a high-capacity magazine should be banned as well. High cap mags have to go. Minimum 5 year federal prison sentence for anyone caught in possession of one, 10 years for possession of two, electric chair for possession of three or more.
- Wumbologist
- I want a do-over
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Făkünamę wrote:Been over this Wumbologist. I don't feel like repeating myself. Use the search function.
Watching people who don't own guns talk about "assault weapons" feels like watching someone who's never opened up the hood of a car explain how to change the timing belt.
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Watching people who don't know what they're talking about, but think they're experts because they pop off some rounds at the range is like..
I own many guns, and unlike you, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. I already had it out with Mozg over this and she knows a fuckload more than you.
I own many guns, and unlike you, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. I already had it out with Mozg over this and she knows a fuckload more than you.
Re: Connecticut (et al)
But go ahead, come at me bro. 

- Wumbologist
- I want a do-over
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Go ahead, enlighten me on what makes an AR-15 a baby-killing murder machine, but not a Mini-14.Făkünamę wrote:Watching people who don't know what they're talking about, but think they're experts because they pop off some rounds at the range is like..
I own many guns, and unlike you, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. I already had it out with Mozg over this and she knows a fuckload more than you.
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Search Function -> Use it
It's all there. Alternatively you can tell me how they're exactly the same. Though I'll probably just laugh. I've made the point here already arguing against Mozg and Seth to my satisfaction (they shut the fuck up).
It's all there. Alternatively you can tell me how they're exactly the same. Though I'll probably just laugh. I've made the point here already arguing against Mozg and Seth to my satisfaction (they shut the fuck up).

- Wumbologist
- I want a do-over
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Făkünamę wrote:Search Function -> Use it
It's all there. Alternatively you can tell me how they're exactly the same.
They're not "exactly the same", or else they'd both be called AR-15's or Mini-14's and not one or the other. However, they will both perform the same function, delivering .223/5.56 downrange at a similar rate of fire. I promise, the AR-15 won't make anyone deader than the Mini-14 just because it's black and has a pistol grip.
Re: Connecticut (et al)
Very good! Because going on a killing spree in a school is very much like firing at a target at the range, they just move a little more right? 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests