Seth wrote:Făkünamę wrote:Wrong. You're arguing that it is good becuz animals do it. It's nature, therefore good. Naturalistic fallacy dood.
I can't believe Rev and I are on the same page here. You misunderstand the argument. It's good because it's pro-survival of the organism, which is a requirement for life, propagation and evolution. Life is an innate "good thing" and so behaviors that protect, enhance and preserve life are likewise innately good, because as Rev says, without that innate morality of life being worthy of protection no living thing would exist.
You said that better than I could.
Although, I would argue with that last point. There would still be living things, but life would be short and miserable. And in all likelihood, wouldn't lead to high intelligence. Actually, the reality is that intelligence (and therefore overt cognitions about preserving one's life) are almost certainly likely to develop in any reasonably stable system given enough time. The reason is that evolution selects for survival. Life really couldn't end up any other way.
That's why the right to life, the right to property, and the right to self defense are natural Organic Rights. They are innately good because without all of them the organism cannot survive, and the first imperative of life is that the organism survive at least long enough to reproduce.
The problem with this, as we've argued about ad-infinitum in the past, is that deriving "rights" from states of being is missing some crucial steps.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.