
An independent Ireland?
- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
Just keep their mitts off me Lucky Charms.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Re: An independent Ireland?
Deal: They may keep their drech 'Whiskey' provided they continue exporting Guinness and Kilkenny.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
The most important export from Ireland is humor. Keep the funnies coming, and I love the Irish.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
Re: An independent Ireland?
Blind groper wrote:The most important export from Ireland is humor. Keep the funnies coming, and I love the Irish.
I married one, funny i dont think so.

“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”
John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.
John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
I prefer Irish whiskey in general to scotch. Not that I'm particularly fussy, but as a rule, I like the usual brands of Irish, or straight american rye.
From what I've read, there was very little interest in home rule in Ireland, until the savage crackdown by the british after the Easter rising.
If they had been restrained and civilised, there never would have been independence. The demand from the public wasn't there originally.
From what I remember, it was executing that sick guy, propped up in a chair, that filled the country with disgust.
And the antics of the Black and Tans. But I don't know if that came later.
But it was generally a self-inflicted own-goal by the british, that grew the demand for independence.
From what I've read, there was very little interest in home rule in Ireland, until the savage crackdown by the british after the Easter rising.
If they had been restrained and civilised, there never would have been independence. The demand from the public wasn't there originally.
From what I remember, it was executing that sick guy, propped up in a chair, that filled the country with disgust.
And the antics of the Black and Tans. But I don't know if that came later.
But it was generally a self-inflicted own-goal by the british, that grew the demand for independence.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Re: An independent Ireland?
I drink Whisky, not Whiskey. That's Canadian Whisky or 'Rye' to the rest of the world. Gibson's Finest as a general rule. But given the choice, I'll choose an Irish ale over a Canadian ale any day. Especially if the Irish ale is Kilkenny (Guinness will do in a pinch).
Re: An independent Ireland?
You'll have missed out on one of the main issues of parliamentary democracy through which Irish nationalists tried to gain independence culminating with the passing of Home Rule legislation ("suspended" for the "duration" of WW1). A period of parliamentary democracy preceded by armed liberation insurrection, preceded by the famine, armed insurrection, Daniel O'Connell parliamentary nationalism, 1798, and so on and so on.mistermack wrote:I prefer Irish whiskey in general to scotch. Not that I'm particularly fussy, but as a rule, I like the usual brands of Irish, or straight american rye.
From what I've read, there was very little interest in home rule in Ireland, until the savage crackdown by the british after the Easter rising.
If they had been restrained and civilised, there never would have been independence. The demand from the public wasn't there originally.
From what I remember, it was executing that sick guy, propped up in a chair, that filled the country with disgust.
And the antics of the Black and Tans. But I don't know if that came later.
But it was generally a self-inflicted own-goal by the british, that grew the demand for independence.
1916 itself was initially unpopular with some parts of the Dublin population - chiefly wives of British soldiers and those who benefited from the colonial raping of Ireland. Liberation and freedom was always part of the public conscience - even before there was an Irish national consciousness.
It is a lie to inflate the initial opposition of Dubliners to suggest that there was no desire for liberty and self-determination.
Even the Irish Volunteers who joined the British Army did so believing that they were fighting that small nations might be free, naively not realising that such small nations did not include Ireland.
It was clear that the political winds were turning against even the limited home rule that was on the statute books. This was clear in the authorities collusion in the importation of a large supply of arms for the UVF - a loyalist force threatening treasonous insurrection to fight against any attempt to implement Home Rule.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Re: An independent Ireland?
This thread oppresses me 

Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
You deserve it.Animavore wrote:This thread oppresses me
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Re: An independent Ireland?
It's all my faultBella Fortuna wrote:You deserve it.Animavore wrote:This thread oppresses me

Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- redunderthebed
- Commie Bastard
- Posts: 6556
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:13 pm
- About me: "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate and wine in each hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"
- Location: Port Lincoln Australia
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
Irish whiskey is awesome especially tullamore dew (and their 12 yo is nom too) and jameson 12 yo.PordFrefect wrote:Deal: They may keep their drech 'Whiskey' provided they continue exporting Guinness and Kilkenny.

The Pope was today knocked down at the start of Christmas mass by a woman who hopped over the barriers. The woman was said to be, "Mentally unstable."Trolldor wrote:Ahh cardinal Pell. He's like a monkey after a lobotomy and three lines of cocaine.
Which is probably why she went unnoticed among a crowd of Christians.
Cormac wrote: One thing of which I am certain. The world is a better place with you in it. Stick around please. The universe will eventually get around to offing all of us. No need to help it in its efforts...
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: An independent Ireland?
I have to agree with Red.
Jamiesons and Tullamore Dew are my favourites. They are also reasonably priced, which sets them apart from the very nice scotch whiskeys.
Jamiesons and Tullamore Dew are my favourites. They are also reasonably priced, which sets them apart from the very nice scotch whiskeys.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
Re: An independent Ireland?
Paddysplainin'Cormac wrote:You'll have missed out on one of the main issues of parliamentary democracy through which Irish nationalists tried to gain independence culminating with the passing of Home Rule legislation ("suspended" for the "duration" of WW1). A period of parliamentary democracy preceded by armed liberation insurrection, preceded by the famine, armed insurrection, Daniel O'Connell parliamentary nationalism, 1798, and so on and so on.mistermack wrote:I prefer Irish whiskey in general to scotch. Not that I'm particularly fussy, but as a rule, I like the usual brands of Irish, or straight american rye.
From what I've read, there was very little interest in home rule in Ireland, until the savage crackdown by the british after the Easter rising.
If they had been restrained and civilised, there never would have been independence. The demand from the public wasn't there originally.
From what I remember, it was executing that sick guy, propped up in a chair, that filled the country with disgust.
And the antics of the Black and Tans. But I don't know if that came later.
But it was generally a self-inflicted own-goal by the british, that grew the demand for independence.
1916 itself was initially unpopular with some parts of the Dublin population - chiefly wives of British soldiers and those who benefited from the colonial raping of Ireland. Liberation and freedom was always part of the public conscience - even before there was an Irish national consciousness.
It is a lie to inflate the initial opposition of Dubliners to suggest that there was no desire for liberty and self-determination.
Even the Irish Volunteers who joined the British Army did so believing that they were fighting that small nations might be free, naively not realising that such small nations did not include Ireland.
It was clear that the political winds were turning against even the limited home rule that was on the statute books. This was clear in the authorities collusion in the importation of a large supply of arms for the UVF - a loyalist force threatening treasonous insurrection to fight against any attempt to implement Home Rule.
Re: An independent Ireland?
devogue wrote:Paddysplainin'Cormac wrote:You'll have missed out on one of the main issues of parliamentary democracy through which Irish nationalists tried to gain independence culminating with the passing of Home Rule legislation ("suspended" for the "duration" of WW1). A period of parliamentary democracy preceded by armed liberation insurrection, preceded by the famine, armed insurrection, Daniel O'Connell parliamentary nationalism, 1798, and so on and so on.mistermack wrote:I prefer Irish whiskey in general to scotch. Not that I'm particularly fussy, but as a rule, I like the usual brands of Irish, or straight american rye.
From what I've read, there was very little interest in home rule in Ireland, until the savage crackdown by the british after the Easter rising.
If they had been restrained and civilised, there never would have been independence. The demand from the public wasn't there originally.
From what I remember, it was executing that sick guy, propped up in a chair, that filled the country with disgust.
And the antics of the Black and Tans. But I don't know if that came later.
But it was generally a self-inflicted own-goal by the british, that grew the demand for independence.
1916 itself was initially unpopular with some parts of the Dublin population - chiefly wives of British soldiers and those who benefited from the colonial raping of Ireland. Liberation and freedom was always part of the public conscience - even before there was an Irish national consciousness.
It is a lie to inflate the initial opposition of Dubliners to suggest that there was no desire for liberty and self-determination.
Even the Irish Volunteers who joined the British Army did so believing that they were fighting that small nations might be free, naively not realising that such small nations did not include Ireland.
It was clear that the political winds were turning against even the limited home rule that was on the statute books. This was clear in the authorities collusion in the importation of a large supply of arms for the UVF - a loyalist force threatening treasonous insurrection to fight against any attempt to implement Home Rule.
You're such a PC koolaid drinker!
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests