Looks like it's time to throw some facts at you:MrJonno wrote:Net immigration into the UK is tiny compared to the general population, population issues simply dont exist in the 1st world
http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/br ... ion-growth
Looks like it's time to throw some facts at you:MrJonno wrote:Net immigration into the UK is tiny compared to the general population, population issues simply dont exist in the 1st world
I agree.laklak wrote:1200 square feet? Where would the pool table go? What about the home theater? The gun locker? Or, most importantly, the BAR? Nah, fuck that.
No we allow the intelligent to reproduce none of this chance crap!Robert_S wrote:I think we out to have a 0.5 or less child policy. Random dice roll decides who gets to reproduce and who doesn't.
Well, just above that 1200 sq.f. And yes, it fits a home theatre and separate rooms for the kids.Coito ergo sum wrote:I agree.laklak wrote:1200 square feet? Where would the pool table go? What about the home theater? The gun locker? Or, most importantly, the BAR? Nah, fuck that.
But, when confronted with some enviro-douche who thinks he can be holier-than-thou because he doesn't drink out of plastic bottles, a good question to ask is "how big is your house, again?" and "do you run central air?" "How long is your commute to work?" LOL
Something I think we can all agree on!mistermack wrote:There should be a new growth figure. Not the gross figure, but the net figure per resident.
.Tero wrote:If you just got rid of dark winters, MiM, it would be perfect.
1.2 million over 19 years. Or, 1.9% of the current population.Drewish wrote:Looks like it's time to throw some facts at you:MrJonno wrote:Net immigration into the UK is tiny compared to the general population, population issues simply dont exist in the 1st world
http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/br ... ion-growth
Pappa wrote:1.2 million over 19 years. Or, 1.9% of the current population.Drewish wrote:Looks like it's time to throw some facts at you:MrJonno wrote:Net immigration into the UK is tiny compared to the general population, population issues simply dont exist in the 1st world
http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/br ... ion-growth
That's a false way of looking at it.Pappa wrote:1.2 million over 19 years. Or, 1.9% of the current population.Drewish wrote:Looks like it's time to throw some facts at you:MrJonno wrote:Net immigration into the UK is tiny compared to the general population, population issues simply dont exist in the 1st world
http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/br ... ion-growth
If they are so hard-working, you would think the international companies would all set up in the immigrants home countries.MrJonno wrote:As you said after a couple of generations they have the same number of children as everyone else (ie they are no longer piss poor). Personally I don't think we get enough immigration in this country I would have for every immigrant we throw out 2 Daily Mail readers. Far rather have people coming from abroad to work hard than some of the layabouts we have here
They do.... a lot.mistermack wrote:If they are so hard-working, you would think the international companies would all set up in the immigrants home countries.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests