Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Tyrannical » Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:34 am

Why even tax corporations? Why not just tax people?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41173
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Svartalf » Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:33 pm

Robert_S wrote:Why are we expected to believe that any entity whose primary objective is to maximize profit will hire any more workers than necessary just because they have had their tax rates reduced?
Because, for some reason, we expect that the people behind such entities might still be good citizens at heart, and the fact that they understand this is an informal contract, and that being greedy on their part is a long term mistake as more people working means more money in the circuit and a generally better economy, so potentially more customers for themselves; and because what's been granted can be taken back.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:57 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Robert_S wrote:Why are we expected to believe that any entity whose primary objective is to maximize profit will hire any more workers than necessary just because they have had their tax rates reduced?
Because, for some reason, we expect that the people behind such entities might still be good citizens at heart, and the fact that they understand this is an informal contract, and that being greedy on their part is a long term mistake as more people working means more money in the circuit and a generally better economy, so potentially more customers for themselves; and because what's been granted can be taken back.
Who expects anyone to believe that ANYONE would hire more workers than necessary?

Good citizens would not, I hope, hire more workers than necessary. I would hope that the charitable organizations I give to are not hiring more workers than necessary and wasting the donation money.

Hiring necessary workers, and refraining from hiring unnecessary workers, is what good financial management requires. I don't hire more yard workers than I need to cut the grass, and I don't hire more roofers than I need to repair my roof. Who are these people that expect businesses to act differently than that and to hire more people than needed?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41173
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Svartalf » Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:51 pm

Who said more than necessary?
One of the big complaints in that industry is a scarcity of personnel, and they were saying they could hire more if the taxes weren't killing them.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:02 pm

Svartalf wrote:Who said more than necessary?
Robert_S. I quoted him.
Svartalf wrote: One of the big complaints in that industry is a scarcity of personnel, and they were saying they could hire more if the taxes weren't killing them.
I'm sure that happens a lot. But, Robert S, in the post you responded to, referred to more workers than necessary, as if companies should hire more than necessary in order to not be selfish creeps.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41173
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Lowering Tax Burden on an Industry

Post by Svartalf » Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:13 pm

Shows that I should make sure I'm fully awake before answering a post, but those moments are generally kept for stuff other than forum posting.
I answered to a question that wasn't the one asked :x
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests