It was a barren rock that belonged to China.Rum wrote:Hong Kong was a barren rock when it was ceded to the UK. By your logic it should have stayed with us When it was 'handed back' it looked like this.Lozzer wrote:Because the Falklands have been a British territory long before the national inception of the Argentine state. The islands are sovereign, and they're entitled to self-determination. They are British, and they want to stay that way. It was 'colonised' by the British, yes, but it's been almost two centuries. There are no 'indigenous' Falk-landers, and no Argentinian has any claim to the land let alone the Argentine government.leo-rcc wrote:And Sean Penn is wrong because...?
The Falklands never belonged to Argentina, and therefore it cannot be "handed BACK" Argentina. It can only be handed "over" to Argentina.