You can't get naturalized any other way. You have to have a green card. Not only is it "much easier" to get naturalized if you have a green card, you can't possibly get naturalized UNLESS you have a green card. Absent some special Congressional award or something, I suppose.maiforpeace wrote:If you came here with green cards, you came legally. It's much easier to get naturalized if you have a green card.kiki5711 wrote:What I don't understand is if a child is brought here let's say about 5 yrs of age, why then15 yrs later they still haven't taken any steps to become a legal citizen and still expect the same benefits as a legal immigrant?
When my family came here from Croatia it took about 5 yrs before we came to US to get all the legal paperwork done, and when we came here we already had our green cards. I don't know what it's called now. All of us, not just our parents.
Well - today, and for the last several decades, replacing a green card has been as easy as filing a form I-90. Current processing time for the form I90, Application for Replacement Green Card is 60-90 days. It's the same application used to renew.maiforpeace wrote:
I had a green card when I arrived in 1957. I lost it....that's all. It took over 15 years for me to first get it replaced, then get naturalized - they wouldn't allow me to apply for naturalization until I had a physical green card.
From the standpoint of replacing a green card, it's very easy. And, actually, present day processing times on most things are far better than they were in the 1990s.maiforpeace wrote:
I had to get two congresspeople involved. The BCIS is one of the most inefficient and cumbersome agencies in the US. It is nothing like the agency it was when you and I entered the US.
But, you'll get no argument from me that the system and the agency should be overhauled and made more efficient. That, of course, has nothing to do with the OP, though.
That sounds strange. I filled out the N-400 for my wife - and we paid a fee (I think it was something like $400 or so). She signed it, a few months later she was called for an interview. They asked her a few questions about American history and government, and she was approved. In another couple of months, she appeared for the very moving swearing in ceremony. Easy-peasy. The whole process took 6 months.maiforpeace wrote: I wonder, how much did it really cost, in taxpayer dollars to get me naturalized. (not to mention the exhorbinant fees that I had to pay, twice in some instances since due to their inefficiency applications elapsed and I had to re-apply and pay again)
Every teenager I ever knew was fully aware of the earliest possible date that they could lawfully drive, and was hell-bent on getting that drivers license.maiforpeace wrote:
Did you have the presence of mind at 15 to take yourself to the DMV office to get your driver's license? If you did, I'd be impressed.
You don't, actually. And, the parent wouldn't be arrested. That's ridiculous.maiforpeace wrote:
Also, back in your day, you didn't need identification to enter an immigration office - now you do, so if an illegal child were to be accompanied by their illegal parent, the parent would be arrested.
Easy, if you comply. Some folks can't make themselves legal because they may well be ineligible.maiforpeace wrote: So, you want to make yourself legal, how do you do it if you don't have identification? Like a drivers license?
Drivers licenses have nothing at all to do with the immigration process. You don't have to have a drivers license.
They have no ability to apply for citizenship, at all. You have to apply for a green card, or a non-immigrant visa.maiforpeace wrote:
So, let's say they are 20 and adult - remember, they don't have a drivers license or passport. So, somehow, you get in. When you apply for citizenship, one usually gives an address, you have to identify who your parents are, you have to swear you haven't done anything illegal - most young people are afraid to apply for fear they will bust their parents.
I would, as I said, overhaul the process to deal with the limited subclass of persons you're talking about, mai. That doesn't mean we just don't bother enforcing immigration law, though. Every country has rules about immigration.
The act has nothing to do with what you just talked about. All the CA law is proposing is that they NOT issue a drivers license to an illegal alien, not provide public financing to illegal aliens, and if an illegal alien is arrested and the ICE issues a request for that person to be turned over, that the state authority will turn the person over.maiforpeace wrote:
So, to answer your questions CES - some which have already done - I think it a bigger waste of both my California and Federal taxpayer dollars to enforce everything that this act is saying it will -
What's the problem?
I would think that the situation you're concerned about ought to be handled with a federal immigration process applicable to innocent children, and persons involuntarily brought to the United States who have no real connection to another country. Set some reasonable requirements, and for those that comply, let them stay.maiforpeace wrote:
I would much rather see my money spent on educating someone who is interested in becoming educated, someone who needs health care, than on the congresspeople who must get involved for special cases to naturalize and get green cards for illegal immigrants, the cost to our police at the cost of real security, and the cost to the BCIS to emply the security tactics to oust illegal aliens out of the country.
The answer can't be what you seem to suggest. Why not just eliminate the entire immigration process and open the borders?