Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post Reply
User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Svartalf » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:09 pm

Actually, my cousin works in a high school, and many of her students are quite legal, albeit I could be their dad.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:14 pm

Svartalf wrote:Actually, my cousin works in a high school, and many of her students are quite legal, albeit I could be their dad.
Shame, that. :sad:

I used to spend two two hour shifts a week teaching English to "los nondocumentos" in San Diego. It would be very amusing to look out the window (classes were held in a storefront to be accessible to the people that wanted to take the classes) and see a teenager dropping off Mom or Dad for class. :hehe:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Svartalf » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:19 pm

What's to be sad about? I don't know what's with priests, but I do think that buggering catholic schoolgirls is better than doing it to little kids.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:22 pm

Svartalf wrote:What's to be sad about? I don't know what's with priests, but I do think that buggering catholic schoolgirls is better than doing it to little kids.
The problem with no fence is that the priests are dying of heart attacks chasing the little kids. The little buggers escape the premises and run up hill, knowing full well the priests can't maintain their pace on level ground. :lay:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Svartalf » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:24 pm

Proves the kids have good genes for survival... with luck, they won't enter the clergy when they grow up, and the church will die of attrition.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:26 pm

Svartalf wrote:Proves the kids have good genes for survival... with luck, they won't enter the clergy when they grow up, and the church will die of attrition.
They have to survive the clergy trying to enter them first. :bored:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41172
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Svartalf » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:30 pm

What do you expect? the ways of the lord are unpenetrable, but nothing is said of little boys.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:31 pm

Svartalf wrote:What do you expect? the ways of the lord are unpenetrable, but nothing is said of little boys.
That's why priests are called "holey men."
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Seth » Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:19 pm

Robert_S wrote:What is described there is trollishness, Seth.


Well, yes, obviously. Have you read my sig lately?
It is deliberately bringing out the worst in people for your own shits and giggles.
Just a few of the Netwits, not everyone. In fact not anyone BUT the Netwits, who seem incapable of doing anything but throwing poo through the bars.

If they don't want to be treated like Netwits, they shouldn't act like Netwits.
But it goes beyond just you and the person you aim at, the rest of the forum have to deal with people at their worst because you feel like bringing it out. It is a form of pollution really and it is inconsiderate to the rest of us.
Then tell the poo-flinging Netwits to clean up their act and behave like adults and engage in adult conversations. Until you do, and they do, I'll do what I do because that's what I need to do to do something about the doo-doo.

I'm not going to take shit from Gawdzilla or anyone else and not give better than I get. Sorry about that, but that's just the way it is.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
John_fi_Skye
Posts: 6099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:02 pm
About me: I'm a sentimental old git. I'm a mawkish old bastard.
Location: Er....Skye.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by John_fi_Skye » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:38 pm

Seth wrote:
Robert_S wrote:What is described there is trollishness, Seth.


Well, yes, obviously. Have you read my sig lately?
It is deliberately bringing out the worst in people for your own shits and giggles.
Just a few of the Netwits, not everyone. In fact not anyone BUT the Netwits, who seem incapable of doing anything but throwing poo through the bars.

If they don't want to be treated like Netwits, they shouldn't act like Netwits.
But it goes beyond just you and the person you aim at, the rest of the forum have to deal with people at their worst because you feel like bringing it out. It is a form of pollution really and it is inconsiderate to the rest of us.
Then tell the poo-flinging Netwits to clean up their act and behave like adults and engage in adult conversations. Until you do, and they do, I'll do what I do because that's what I need to do to do something about the doo-doo.

I'm not going to take shit from Gawdzilla or anyone else and not give better than I get. Sorry about that, but that's just the way it is.
:bored:
Pray, do not mock me: I am a very foolish fond old man; And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind.

Blah blah blah blah blah!

Memo to self: no Lir chocolates.

Life is glorious.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:43 pm

John_fi_Skye wrote: :bored:
Nothing surprising.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Robert_S » Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:38 pm

Seth wrote:
Robert_S wrote:What is described there is trollishness, Seth.


Well, yes, obviously. Have you read my sig lately?
It is deliberately bringing out the worst in people for your own shits and giggles.
Just a few of the Netwits, not everyone. In fact not anyone BUT the Netwits, who seem incapable of doing anything but throwing poo through the bars.

If they don't want to be treated like Netwits, they shouldn't act like Netwits.
But it goes beyond just you and the person you aim at, the rest of the forum have to deal with people at their worst because you feel like bringing it out. It is a form of pollution really and it is inconsiderate to the rest of us.
Then tell the poo-flinging Netwits to clean up their act and behave like adults and engage in adult conversations. Until you do, and they do, I'll do what I do because that's what I need to do to do something about the doo-doo.

I'm not going to take shit from Gawdzilla or anyone else and not give better than I get. Sorry about that, but that's just the way it is.
You invite me to have a reasonable discussion while you inform me that you deliberately provoke the poo flinging you say will make it impossible. It seems to me that this is honest and dishonest at the same time.

You complain about the image that people have about Libertarianism yet you deliberately take on unpleasant absolutist positions to "watch them foam at the mouth". If it is so hard to have a reasonable discussion here, then why are you not off in greener, more reasonable pastures?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:02 pm

Because we're troll-friendly, of course.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:18 pm

Svartalf wrote:Maybe we should try it. I mean, if it's so great, it would be a shame only clergy enjoy it.
THAT is the special knowledge Seth was talking about.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Pope thinks child buggery isn't so bad

Post by Seth » Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:34 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Seth wrote:
Robert_S wrote:What is described there is trollishness, Seth.


Well, yes, obviously. Have you read my sig lately?
It is deliberately bringing out the worst in people for your own shits and giggles.
Just a few of the Netwits, not everyone. In fact not anyone BUT the Netwits, who seem incapable of doing anything but throwing poo through the bars.

If they don't want to be treated like Netwits, they shouldn't act like Netwits.
But it goes beyond just you and the person you aim at, the rest of the forum have to deal with people at their worst because you feel like bringing it out. It is a form of pollution really and it is inconsiderate to the rest of us.
Then tell the poo-flinging Netwits to clean up their act and behave like adults and engage in adult conversations. Until you do, and they do, I'll do what I do because that's what I need to do to do something about the doo-doo.

I'm not going to take shit from Gawdzilla or anyone else and not give better than I get. Sorry about that, but that's just the way it is.
You invite me to have a reasonable discussion while you inform me that you deliberately provoke the poo flinging you say will make it impossible. It seems to me that this is honest and dishonest at the same time.


It's ridiculously easy to have a civilized debate with me. All you have to do is be civilized, polite and act like an adult, and show some scholarship and genuine interest in exploring a subject.
You complain about the image that people have about Libertarianism yet you deliberately take on unpleasant absolutist positions to "watch them foam at the mouth".
Well, that's because I'm well aware of the fact that most of the Netwits who infest this and other like fora, have absolutely no interest in a reasonable discussion, so I choose to troll them instead because it amuses me to do so. Occasionally someone with an actual intellect will come along and eschew the cheap shots of the peanut gallery, and we have a nice discussion. Not often though.
If it is so hard to have a reasonable discussion here, then why are you not off in greener, more reasonable pastures?
Because I also take pleasure in twitting the Netwits into making intemperate and idiotic statements that I can use against them, and atheism in general, in other venues. There's nothing quite like extracting some utter nonsense Gawdzilla or Schenibester has spewed as an example of the mindless stupidity of Atheists and a condemnation of their false claims to be somehow more rational or more intelligent than the theists that they are constantly insulting.

Truth is, every theist I know is far smarter, more erudite, better educated, more rational, more reasonable, more respectful, more polite and generally better company (conversationally and socially) than all but a very few Atheists I'm acquainted with.

So, in a way, I'm just slumming here because it amuses me to do so. But occasionally I'm pleasantly surprised by someone here who shows a genuine interest in having a vigorous, but reasonable, discussion. Rare, but possible.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests