And how you propose to do thatZombie Gawdzilla wrote: A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.

And how you propose to do thatZombie Gawdzilla wrote: A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.
That doesn't mean we should give up trying to educate people about it, does it? The efforts to control world population will have to get stronger or Darwin and Malthus will step in and do it for us.Tyrannical wrote:And how you propose to do thatZombie Gawdzilla wrote: A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Voluntary birth control has not worked very well so far.
Tyrannical has been channeling Thomas Malthus for years. An appeal to sanity won't stop that now.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Tyrannical wrote:In the civilized Western countries, under population is our problem. Since multiculturalism has been mostly a failure, importing foreigners from more populace nations to offset this is losing popularity. So while much of the rest of the world is over populated, we are left in a situation where we have to encourage women to have more children.
It's probably going to be the winner in any case. Short, brutal decimation of the population followed by the survivors picking up the pieces. The Earth Abides or, The Stand, for example.Seraph wrote:Tyrannical has been channeling Thomas Malthus for years. An appeal to sanity won't stop that now.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Tyrannical wrote:In the civilized Western countries, under population is our problem. Since multiculturalism has been mostly a failure, importing foreigners from more populace nations to offset this is losing popularity. So while much of the rest of the world is over populated, we are left in a situation where we have to encourage women to have more children.
Channeling Francis Galton used to get me into trouble at Ratskep.Seraph wrote:Tyrannical has been channeling Thomas Malthus for years. An appeal to sanity won't stop that now.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Tyrannical wrote:In the civilized Western countries, under population is our problem. Since multiculturalism has been mostly a failure, importing foreigners from more populace nations to offset this is losing popularity. So while much of the rest of the world is over populated, we are left in a situation where we have to encourage women to have more children.
Posting the time and date can get you in trouble at Ratskep.Tyrannical wrote:Channeling Francis Galton used to get me into trouble at Ratskep.Seraph wrote:Tyrannical has been channeling Thomas Malthus for years. An appeal to sanity won't stop that now.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Tyrannical wrote:In the civilized Western countries, under population is our problem. Since multiculturalism has been mostly a failure, importing foreigners from more populace nations to offset this is losing popularity. So while much of the rest of the world is over populated, we are left in a situation where we have to encourage women to have more children.
Well, it is a bit of a race against time. Ethiopia for example has over twice the population now then when the great televised famine of the 80's took place.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:That doesn't mean we should give up trying to educate people about it, does it? The efforts to control world population will have to get stronger or Darwin and Malthus will step in and do it for us.Tyrannical wrote:And how you propose to do thatZombie Gawdzilla wrote: A saner solution would be to have the over-populating societies have fewer children, of course.Voluntary birth control has not worked very well so far.
There is no way Africa can feed 2.4 billion people by 2100, and the shortfalls will be too much for imports to cover if there are a few bad crop years.A new study titled 'Africa's Demographic Multiplication', commissioned by the Washington-based Globalist Research Center, points out that Africa's population has more than tripled during the second half of the 20th century, growing from 230 million to 811 million.
Nigeria, Africa's most populous country at 158 million, is expected to grow to 730 million by century's end, making it larger than Europe's projected population of 675 million.
ut 10 other countries in the African continent are expected to join that club before the close of the century: the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Niger, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.
Together, he says, the population of these 11 African nations is expected to reach 2.4 billion by 2100, representing about a quarter of the world's population at that time
I take it you've never read any of Tyrannical's other posts?Exi5tentialist wrote:Well this thread has taken a shift to the right since the last time I looked at it. From "World Population" we have now gong to "over-population" with nobody batting an eyelid. And it's a white/black thing, according to Tyrannical. We whites are underpopulated, and there are too many blacks.
You mean a west/non-west thing? Yes, that is a good disguise for what I am talking about.charlou wrote:Seems you're taking the black and white stance there, Exi5 ... It's a location/culture thing, actually.
Wrong. I've read rather too many of Tyrannical's other posts actually, and rather too many of yours as well.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:I take it you've never read any of Tyrannical's other posts?Exi5tentialist wrote:Well this thread has taken a shift to the right since the last time I looked at it. From "World Population" we have now gong to "over-population" with nobody batting an eyelid. And it's a white/black thing, according to Tyrannical. We whites are underpopulated, and there are too many blacks.
That's remarkable. From you posts I got the impression that you didn't know how to read. Is this a new thing?Exi5tentialist wrote:Wrong. I've read rather too many of Tyrannical's other posts actually, and rather too many of yours as well.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:I take it you've never read any of Tyrannical's other posts?Exi5tentialist wrote:Well this thread has taken a shift to the right since the last time I looked at it. From "World Population" we have now gong to "over-population" with nobody batting an eyelid. And it's a white/black thing, according to Tyrannical. We whites are underpopulated, and there are too many blacks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests