mistermack wrote:As far as the photo goes, it's hardly the withholding of vital evidence, and it's not clear that the photo can be trusted. The chain of evidence isn't clear.
To you perhaps, but then again you don't know what you're talking about, so it's hardly determinative. The police, on the other hand, those who actually saw Zimmerman's head at the time, can easily corroborate or refute the photo when it's time to do so...in court.
The police reports state that Zimmerman was bleeding from the head and nose.
Which means that the police actually observed blood on Zimmerman, which is corroborated by the photos, including the ones you HAVEN'T seen that the police certainly have but have declined to release to the press, as they are required to do.
The prosecution are hardly likely to dispute police statements. There OUGHT to be plenty of available evidence, that hasn't been released to the public.
Precisely.
There should have been proper still photos, take in the police station, of any injuries.
I'm reasonably certain there were. That YOU haven't seen them is utterly meaningless.
His clothes should have been retained for evidence.
And they most probably were, and the fact that YOU don't know is, again, utterly meaningless.
That professor is clearly trying to line up another book deal, by trying to get involved. It's a lucrative industry in the States.
And that has what, exactly, to do with Zimmerman's guilt or innocence?
I would imagine that the police prosecution will argue that carrying a gun doesn't entitle you to kill someone,
Only an idiot would make any such claim to begin with.
if you cause a fight, and get the worst of it.
But if you don't cause a fight and someone attacks you unlawfully, while a gun doesn't "entitle" you to kill someone, their actions may well do exactly that, and it's appearing more and more like Martin's actions got him killed and that Zimmerman acted lawfully in doing so.
A gun licence isn't a licence to kill.
Only an idiot would think it is.
Zimmerman's cuts. if any, were minor.
Remote psychic diagnosis there Dr. Mistermack? Do you dowse for water and communicate with deceased loved ones too?
He needed no stitches. His "broken nose" was minor. And there is no proof how he got them.
He doesn't need proof how he got them, the prosecution needs proof that he DID NOT get them as the result of being feloniously attacked by Martin. Presumption of innocence and all that doncha know...
Jump on someone, and you might easily cut your head on the pavement, and they might well punch you on the nose.
And all the prosecution has to do is prove beyond a reasonable doubt that that's the way it happened and Zimmerman will go to prison for murder. But it's not looking very good for the prosecution's case at the moment, as all the evidence available to the public points to corroboration of Zimmerman's story and a justifiable shooting.
It's basically a publicity-hungry wanker, trying to get involved for the money.
Which, again, has what exactly to do with Zimmerman's guilt or innocence?
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.