
Oh noes, nasty big bad man going to attack our offices, homes and families. Awww, he's cute when he's threatening.
May as well go out in a blaze of glory I suppose.Lozzer wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 05749.html
![]()
Oh noes, nasty big bad man going to attack our offices, homes and families. Awww, he's cute when he's threatening.
At least he hasn't imposed Sharia. That's like saying "At least I'm not as trashy as those people on Jerry Springer" though.Lozzer wrote:I don't understand why he's not dead yet, or why a lot of the public sympathise with him, or take the silly view that he wouldn't be resorting to such desperate threats of annihilation were it not for NATO's intervention. He's an absolute scumbag, and the type of person every rational, freedom and democracy embracing individual should despise.
For all intents and purposes, his regime is inseparable from 'traditional' despotic theocracies.Robert_S wrote:At least he hasn't imposed Sharia. That's like saying "At least I'm not as trashy as those people on Jerry Springer" though.Lozzer wrote:I don't understand why he's not dead yet, or why a lot of the public sympathise with him, or take the silly view that he wouldn't be resorting to such desperate threats of annihilation were it not for NATO's intervention. He's an absolute scumbag, and the type of person every rational, freedom and democracy embracing individual should despise.
He's not dead because eitherLozzer wrote:I don't understand why he's not dead yet, or why a lot of the public sympathise with him, or take the silly view that he wouldn't be resorting to such desperate threats of annihilation were it not for NATO's intervention. He's an absolute scumbag, and the type of person every rational, freedom and democracy embracing individual should despise.
I suppose.Svartalf wrote:He's not dead because eitherLozzer wrote:I don't understand why he's not dead yet, or why a lot of the public sympathise with him, or take the silly view that he wouldn't be resorting to such desperate threats of annihilation were it not for NATO's intervention. He's an absolute scumbag, and the type of person every rational, freedom and democracy embracing individual should despise.
a) no head of state with the kind of black op sector needed for such a thing has yet had the balls to give the order
or
b) he's paranoid enough to have evaded the killers as of yet
I guess b) or the bombardment incident where one of his sons and some grandchildren were killed would not have happened.
As for the public having sympathies for him... where do you live, Bizarro world?
That's the fuckers.Svartalf wrote:Oh, you mean the kind of bloomin' ultra liberal morons who are all about 'the West is Evil' and cultural relativism and how we ought to all commit suicide, with the possible exception of nubile women, and bequeathe all our lands, goods, survivors, culture and technology to our former colonies as the least of possible amends?
Ooh, a complimentSvartalf wrote:Man, you disappoint me, at your age, I was one of them, took me long to become wiser.
Given Sharia law is viewed as a real alternative in that region, perhaps this helps explain Qadafi's popularity.Robert_S wrote:At least he hasn't imposed Sharia. That's like saying "At least I'm not as trashy as those people on Jerry Springer" though.
And Saddam'sWarren Dew wrote:Given Sharia law is viewed as a real alternative in that region, perhaps this helps explain Qadafi's popularity.Robert_S wrote:At least he hasn't imposed Sharia. That's like saying "At least I'm not as trashy as those people on Jerry Springer" though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests