Simpsons Game Thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:14 am

My character would indicate that zigmen is not sticking to the Simpson's script.
DP's indication that he was Marge is what he thought would clear him.
I think that kind of assertion would put him as town anyway.
That's the way I'm leaning with him.

Callan
Invincible
Posts: 4637
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Callan » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:16 am

Why are we all outing at irre's request? I'm still not seeing any better reason to trust her than 'I'm making investigations and I know I'm town, so there.'
She's flip-flopping with her vote again (4 times so far) just like yesterday - what's going on with that?
And MZ seems to be standing right at her shoulder, backing her up in everything, including flip-flopping his own vote (only 3 times, but hey).
I can't shake the feeling that we are being played, here.

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:19 am

I haven't outed.
I am still waiting for Irre to give some clarification about her clearances.
I've seen enough not to consider voting her today, nor anyone else she says she's cleared.

oblivion
Noble Savage
Posts: 5860
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by oblivion » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:29 am

So once again, Ani.

Thoughts?

User avatar
normal
!
!
Posts: 9071
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
About me: meh
Location: North, and then some
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by normal » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:38 am

Callan wrote:Why are we all outing at irre's request? I'm still not seeing any better reason to trust her than 'I'm making investigations and I know I'm town, so there.'
She's flip-flopping with her vote again (4 times so far) just like yesterday - what's going on with that?
And MZ seems to be standing right at her shoulder, backing her up in everything, including flip-flopping his own vote (only 3 times, but hey).
I can't shake the feeling that we are being played, here.
I've been feeling that strongly since I read through day one. I feel like I'm being played, and that scum are laughing at us for following. Why are we so trusting?
Image
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -Douglas Adams

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:10 am

Normal wrote:
Callan wrote:Why are we all outing at irre's request? I'm still not seeing any better reason to trust her than 'I'm making investigations and I know I'm town, so there.'
She's flip-flopping with her vote again (4 times so far) just like yesterday - what's going on with that?
And MZ seems to be standing right at her shoulder, backing her up in everything, including flip-flopping his own vote (only 3 times, but hey).
I can't shake the feeling that we are being played, here.
I've been feeling that strongly since I read through day one. I feel like I'm being played, and that scum are laughing at us for following. Why are we so trusting?
I feel no more on the inside than anyone else.
I've given Irre no information aside from a veiled reference to an item I hold.

I don't see how anyone has been taken in.
I would like Irre to clarify for everybody what she has established and why, rather than creating the illusion of an inner circle of trusted innocents.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:20 am

Callan wrote:Why are we all outing at irre's request? I'm still not seeing any better reason to trust her than 'I'm making investigations and I know I'm town, so there.'
She's flip-flopping with her vote again (4 times so far) just like yesterday - what's going on with that?
And MZ seems to be standing right at her shoulder, backing her up in everything, including flip-flopping his own vote (only 3 times, but hey).
I can't shake the feeling that we are being played, here.
I don't mind about the flip flopping.

That's why I voted Normal, and then unvoted. There's such a thing as changing your mind as you go along to find out new things. And posting what you think while you're doing it.

Actually, flip flopping, to me, looks more town.

Though, I am beginning to have reservations about Irre too.

What does Apu's convenience store have anything to do with all this?

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:28 am

Well, my choices are Mort or Ani.

I'll go with my first choice.

vote Morticia

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by irretating » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:52 am

OK, it is clear that no more will be gleaned, so I'm happy to share. I am Ned Flanders. Howdily doodily folks. I was told in my initial PM that town people could have some items (I was given two examples, one of which charlou mentioned on day 1, the other I hinted at in a post) that serve no purpose whatever. I am not Apu, but wondered if Apu had some fish. I'm paraphrasing. I don't know what this has to do with the game design, but it seemed a good way to spot some town.

I prefer the bandwagon on gallstones rather than morticia, i have to say.
Vote gallstones

Callan
Invincible
Posts: 4637
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Callan » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:01 am

I'm having trouble understanding how there can be a so-called inner circle of "trusted" innocents in a no-PM game. I thought the only people who could contact each other were scum?

And I'm sorry, Mantis, but I don't care if you're ok with irre and MZ's flip-flop voting, because I'm still suspicious of you for your eagerness to save irre from being lynched on Day One. This is looking like a concerted effort now.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Animavore » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:43 am

Why is no one voting gib?

Did you forget about him?

Vote gib.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:45 am

Callan wrote: And I'm sorry, Mantis, but I don't care if you're ok with irre and MZ's flip-flop voting, because I'm still suspicious of you for your eagerness to save irre from being lynched on Day One. This is looking like a concerted effort now.
I think you're looking into it too much. I was just going off my own feeling of her being innocent (at the time).

There was a lot of talk that she spoke in 'fluffy' terms, and I just didn't see it.

And it now seems as though many seem to think she is town. What about all those people now who think that? UT? MZ? Are they suspicious to you because they think that?

irretating wrote:OK, it is clear that no more will be gleaned, so I'm happy to share. I am Ned Flanders. Howdily doodily folks. I was told in my initial PM that town people could have some items (I was given two examples, one of which charlou mentioned on day 1, the other I hinted at in a post) that serve no purpose whatever. I am not Apu, but wondered if Apu had some fish. I'm paraphrasing. I don't know what this has to do with the game design, but it seemed a good way to spot some town.
Interesting.

Maybe that's a red herring.

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:54 am

Let's just clear up once and for all why I think Irre is legit. She mentioned some ammo, which my character holds. I was worried, it being ammo, that I'd be telegraphing the vig to scum. That is obviously not the case. Anyway, I think Irre got the reference in the list and that was maybe enough to convince her that I'm town.

That's all I know. I'm glad this ammo isn't actually required though.

Callan
Invincible
Posts: 4637
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Callan » Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:56 am

Ani's right, of course. We're forgetting about Gib.
Either that or we're being led away from remembering by this clever distraction about the "trusted innocents" and their mysterious "objects".

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Simpsons Day 2

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Nov 21, 2010 12:00 pm

The jester issue has never gone away. And gib is very much central to that.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests