The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post Reply
User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by mistermack » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:39 pm

One more thing I would point out is that people like Coito get all offended when someone has a go at US stereotypes, but how fucking backwards can an electorate be, to elect people like Todd Akin?

The only conclusion you can possibly draw, is that a majority of the voters in his constituency are even more moronic than he is.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:57 pm

An excellent point there.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Rum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:38 pm

Well he's hanging on in there hoping to make it through without going down in flames. He says now:

"The mistake was in the words I said not the heart I hold", whatever that means. He follows that with a request for forgiveness. As good Christians we should of course forgive him. We are, after all, made imperfect..

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:41 pm

Rum wrote:Well he's hanging on in there hoping to make it through without going down in flames. He has says now:

"The mistake was in the words I said not the heart I hold", whatever that means. He follows that with a request for forgiveness. As good Christians we should of course forgive him. We are, after all, made imperfect..
Fuckit! Let's be bastards! :evil:

I was born this way, but maybe I can teach...
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Rum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:43 pm

I love this new phrase we have been hearing from American politicians this last few years. 'Misspoke'. Fucking great way of backing away from total shitspeak!

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:46 pm

Aw look, he was only doing what he thought was right, So did Pol Pot and Peter Sutcliffe. It's only comic supervillians that think they are "eeeeevil".

Lesson, beware do-gooders, they could be Hitler.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:47 pm

Audley Strange wrote:Aw look, he was only doing what he thought was right, So did Pol Pot and Peter Sutcliffe. It's only comic supervillians that think they are "eeeeevil".

Lesson, beware do-gooders, they could be Hitler.
Dammit 4chan... It went through my head again!!! :lay:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:00 pm

mistermack wrote:The only conclusion you can possibly draw, is that a majority of the voters in his constituency are even more moronic than he is.
True, that's the only conclusion one could possibly draw if one is that stupid. If one were think about it a for a bit other conclusions would present themselves. Unless one is too stupid to think about them. That does happen here.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:10 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Audley Strange wrote:Aw look, he was only doing what he thought was right, So did Pol Pot and Peter Sutcliffe. It's only comic supervillians that think they are "eeeeevil".

Lesson, beware do-gooders, they could be Hitler.
Dammit 4chan... It went through my head again!!! :lay:
that Pepsi "Hitler did nothing wrong" thing? I've been chuckling about that for days.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:15 pm

Audley Strange wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
Audley Strange wrote:Aw look, he was only doing what he thought was right, So did Pol Pot and Peter Sutcliffe. It's only comic supervillians that think they are "eeeeevil".

Lesson, beware do-gooders, they could be Hitler.
Dammit 4chan... It went through my head again!!! :lay:
that Pepsi "Hitler did nothing wrong" thing? I've been chuckling about that for days.
So wrong. Yet it is so funny to me... Maybe its because Hitler was a Diet Coke man.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:17 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Audley Strange wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
Audley Strange wrote:Aw look, he was only doing what he thought was right, So did Pol Pot and Peter Sutcliffe. It's only comic supervillians that think they are "eeeeevil".

Lesson, beware do-gooders, they could be Hitler.
Dammit 4chan... It went through my head again!!! :lay:
that Pepsi "Hitler did nothing wrong" thing? I've been chuckling about that for days.
So wrong. Yet it is so funny to me... Maybe its because Hitler was a Diet Coke man.
New Coke is the new Third Reich Coke.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Rum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:25 pm

'Gushing Granny' came second [sic] :hehe:

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:26 pm

fascists were Fantaics
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:28 pm

Akin is dropping out of the race.

Wait, no he's not.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2 ... e-comment/
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The new 'legitimate' rape controversy

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:41 pm

Rum wrote:
klr wrote:"Legitimate rape?" What was he actually trying to say? :dono:
That women misreport it.

Then of course it is their own fault they are pregnant, REAL rape doesn't get you pregnant. What a fucktard.
I think that he probably was setting apart violent or forcible rape, from statutory rape or a rape that occurs through misunderstandings. Not all rape is forcible or violent, although all rape is wrong. Some rape occurs without the male intending to rape. The male can intend to have sex and honestly believe that the woman is consenting, but if she is, in fact, not consenting then it is rape still.

He is, of course, still a fucktard. Because no rape is legitimate, and and to use that word is just, well, fucktarded.

I am quite interested to know, however, where he gets the idea that a woman's body distinguishes rapes from consensual sex, and reacts to prevent pregnancy. I can honestly say, I have never in my life heard such a theory espoused by anyone, anywhere. I've tried to google this idea, and I have found nothing.

Has anyone asked numbnuts where he got this idea?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests