
It got spoilered by a mod.

There is nothing wrong with the rules and a few from this side have joined so hopefully it will not be just a mirror image of its two sisters. I mentioned this on it expecting some criticism and nothing, absolutely nothing so that is good. I would like it if the two sides were equally balanced. But early days yet so we shall have to take it one at a time. But thumbs up so far.Clinton Huxley wrote:I think it has a rule about having many, many rules.Bella Fortuna wrote:
Many, many rules.
Go off? Hasn't it been obvious everyone is telling them to calm down or fuck off for a long while? It's a party, not a place for someone's drunk neurotic cousin to come burdening me with her fucking personal issues after some guy asked her if she'd like a drink or for that mad bitch over there to start going on about the Illuminati being a social construct that makes you want to eat babies if you don't buy her friend's magic turd on a string.Nibbler wrote:PZ Myers describing A+
Imagine a great big party with a lot of diverse attitudes present, and you discover that a few of the invited attendees are also hooligans who wander about calling everyone “cunts” and slapping derrieres and telling women to stop being so sensitive, it was only a quick fondle. Also they smell bad. We’re the segment of the party that’s decided to go off to the library and enjoy some good conversation with the interesting people.
The problem is once you know they spolier/delete, you can never be 100% sure about anything on their forum.Bella Fortuna wrote:
It got spoilered by a mod.
- Jen McCreight (Atheism +).We can criticize religion and irrational thinking just as unabashedly and just as publicly, but we need to stop exempting ourselves from that criticism.
HomerJay wrote:
Hey at least she recognises they've been deliberately exempting themselves from criticism yes? Now if she can go that one step further and actually consider, is it women's rights and equality and civility we despise or could it be something else?Coito ergo sum wrote:- Jen McCreight (Atheism +).We can criticize religion and irrational thinking just as unabashedly and just as publicly, but we need to stop exempting ourselves from that criticism.
Huh, there seems to be a HEAVY does of irony, since those criticizing the ideas expressed by Atheism +'ers are dismissed as disgusting, persons to be made pariahs, unwelcome in the movement, sinners to be purged, "evil" and the like....
What the fuck, Atheism +? http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/201 ... f-atheism/
Indeed. Prepackaged ideological thinking leads to pogroms, genocide, ethnic cleansing, death camps and a whole host of other lovely behaviours that are only a few steps away from the naive thinking of "the world would be a better place if only EVERYONE..."Robert_S wrote:There are many out there that think social-political outlooks come in packages with labels. Much evil comes from this.
Yes, it will be difficult if PZ starts off with 'OK, a show of hands now, which of you are just cunts?'Taqiyya Mockingbird wrote:Apparently PZ Myers, Matt Dillahunty, and Greta Christina are scheduled as presenters at the American Atheists Convention in Denver this week. I'm wondering how all this Theism of Atheism nonsense is going to play out there. Especially since I live rather close to where it is going to be held....
HomerJay wrote:Yes, it will be difficult if PZ starts off with 'OK, a show of hands now, which of you are just cunts?'Taqiyya Mockingbird wrote:Apparently PZ Myers, Matt Dillahunty, and Greta Christina are scheduled as presenters at the American Atheists Convention in Denver this week. I'm wondering how all this Theism of Atheism nonsense is going to play out there. Especially since I live rather close to where it is going to be held....
I recognise the name, from FTB?
If I sign up at Atheism+ forum I was thinking of the user name Otis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests