US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post Reply

Should the US take military action in Iran?

Yes - directly
2
29%
Yes - through a proxy (eg Israel)
0
No votes
No - neither
5
71%
 
Total votes: 7

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Exi5tentialist » Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:27 am

According to the IAEA, Iran is getting closer and closer to producing its own nuclear weapons. Should the US put a stop to this now before it is too late? They could do it themselves or use a client state. What do you think?

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Animavore » Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:34 am

It would be hypocritical of them to give out about another country having nuclear weapons. Anyway, every country having nuclear weapons trained on each other might actually bring world peace if everyone is at a Mexican stand-off.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Exi5tentialist
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Coalville
Contact:

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Exi5tentialist » Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:41 am

Animavore wrote:a Mexican stand-off.
Love it. Subtitles in arabic.


User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Pappa » Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:10 pm

What right do the US have to stop another county developing nukes?

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Ian » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:30 pm

Pappa wrote:What right do the US have to stop another county developing nukes?
None, but we have every right to be concerned about the implications of it. Australia could probably develop one and it wouldn't make anyone especially nervous.

Anyway, if Israel does ever strike Iranian nuclear facilities, don't think for a minute it's only because they had approval from Uncle Sam. Israel doesn't consider itself a puppet of the US, not by a frickin' mile.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Jason » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:40 pm

Ian wrote:
Pappa wrote:What right do the US have to stop another county developing nukes?
None, but we have every right to be concerned about the implications of it. Australia could probably develop one and it wouldn't make anyone especially nervous.

Anyway, if Israel does ever strike Iranian nuclear facilities, don't think for a minute it's only because they had approval from Uncle Sam. Israel doesn't consider itself a puppet of the US, not by a frickin' mile.
No, but Israel does consider itself under the protection of Uncle Sam. At least, covered by a flag of extreme leniency. :smug:

Your first argument boils down to simple in-group/out-group thinking. Australia is part of the Commonwealth which is allied with the USA. Iran is most definitely not part of the club. To be concerned about the implications of a rise in power of a nation not in your faction is something that hearkens back to the dawn of civilization.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Ian » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:48 pm

Very much true, but in the case of Iran there are some real proliferation concerns (Hezbollah, etc.). There are also concerns that the standard logic of deterrence might not work against leaders who factor in things like martyrdom and Paradise in their strategic thinking.

Optimist that I am, though, I don't think either problem would likely come to pass. An Iranian-built bomb set off somewhere, whether Tehran approved it or not, would effectively mean the end of Iran.

I honestly don't blame Iran at all for wanting a bomb. They want one in order to be able to throw more weight around the region, and because they see themselves surrounded by enemies. And the US is probably a secondary concern at best when put next to Saudi Arabia and other regional states. Once the US is no longer dependent on oil from the Gulf, they won't be around the region much for the Iranians to gripe about. But other adversaries will remain.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Jason » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:58 pm

Good points. An Iranian nuke is not a direct threat to the USA, only a few of its allies and natural resource farms - such as Saudi Arabia.

But the middle eastern states, including Saudi Arabia will become increasingly dependent on North America and Europe for other natural resources - such as fresh water. They may want to be in a better bargaining position for when that time comes I suspect.

ETA: With the exception of Brazil (another topic in itself), the USA and Canada have the largest renewable fresh water resources in the world. Just saying.

http://www.worldwater.org/data20082009/Table1.pdf

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: US Military Action in Iran - Poll

Post by Ian » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:51 pm

PordFrefect wrote:Good points. An Iranian nuke is not a direct threat to the USA, only a few of its allies and natural resource farms - such as Saudi Arabia.

But the middle eastern states, including Saudi Arabia will become increasingly dependent on North America and Europe for other natural resources - such as fresh water. They may want to be in a better bargaining position for when that time comes I suspect.

ETA: With the exception of Brazil (another topic in itself), the USA and Canada have the largest renewable fresh water resources in the world. Just saying.

http://www.worldwater.org/data20082009/Table1.pdf
We might be derailing a bit much, but that's true. However, imported water from North America isn't something the Middle East can realistically expect. I can't imagine we'll be seeing supertankers full of fresh water crossing the oceans anytime soon. Investments in desalinization will be crucial, not trade.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests