Exposing fundamentalists and Libertarians

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Borrowed from AF.com.

While libertarians once traced their descent from John Locke, and more recently from the deeply anti-Christian Ayn Rand, Reconstructionism represents an increasingly important foundation for their views. A recently released sociology study, "Cultures of the Tea Party", found that Tea Party supporters are characterised by four dispositions: "authoritarianism, ontological insecurity, libertarianism, and nativism". Since traditional libertarianism was purportedly the opposite of authoritarianism, this highlights how radically libertarianism has changed - a conclusion that's echoed by the 2011 Pew Reaserch Political Typology Poll, which found that religious and economic conservatives had completely merged into one single group since 2006 and all previous polling.

What this means in the long run is far from clear. But it strongly suggests a solidfying outlook with deep Reconstructionist sympathies that actually looks at government failure to deal with major issues, such as restoring the economy, as a positive good. If faith in American institutions collapses entirely, then who wouldn't give Biblical law a shot? The more loudly such people proclaim themselves patriots, the more loudly they cheer for US collapse. It's not just Obama they want to fail. It's the very idea of America.

A very good look at the dominionists, Libertarians and Xtian fundamentalists.. To you faithful followers of Ron Paul and his fucking lunatic followers I suggest you read this in its entirety.. It might just change your minds, but for many of you sadly I seriously doubt it.

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/op ... 23228.html

[Feck]

[quote ]It's pure fearmongering mendacity.

There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the current presidential candidates are interested in creating a Christian "dominionist" theocracy even if they could, which they can't.[/quote]

[Gawdzilla Sama]

It's pure fearmongering mendacity.

There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the current presidential candidates are interested in creating a Christian "dominionist" theocracy even if they could, which they can't.

The dude should google "Dominionism".

[Seth]

It's pure fearmongering mendacity.

There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the current presidential candidates are interested in creating a Christian "dominionist" theocracy even if they could, which they can't.

And the propaganda in the OP proves this claim. It's utter tripe and nothing more than an asinine and ill-informed personal opinion from some unnamed source. The left is notorious for pulling propagandistic lies and half-truths out of their ass and parading it as truth, as in this case.

And Al Jazeera is hardly a credible source...ever...but particularly when it comes to Christian-bashing. It's a Muslim radical yellow-journalism rag not ever worth wiping your ass with.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

[Feck]

http://www.frc.org/

[Gawdzilla Sama]

http://www.frc.org/

"yeah, but..."

[Feck]

http://www.frc.org/

"yeah, but..."

Oh sorry was I mendacious ?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

http://www.frc.org/

"yeah, but..."

Oh sorry was I mendacious ?

It was in quotes because that's what the apologists would say, "yeah, but no True Christian supports that kind of thing."

[Seth]

http://www.frc.org/

Now all you have to do (besides giving the FRC a nice plug) is find quotes on the site indicating that the FRC advocates overthrowing the US Constitution and wishes to institute a "Dominionist Theocracy."

Good luck with that.

Until then, you're just blowing leftist/atheist propaganda and unsubstantiated smears in true Alinsky fashion out your ass.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

http://www.frc.org/

Now all you have to do (besides giving the FRC a nice plug) is find quotes on the site indicating that the FRC advocates overthrowing the US Constitution and wishes to institute a "Dominionist Theocracy."

Good luck with that.

Until then, you're just blowing leftist/atheist propaganda and unsubstantiated smears in true Alinsky fashion out your ass.

So, Seth, do Bachmann or Perry support the FRC program?

[Seth]

http://www.frc.org/

Now all you have to do (besides giving the FRC a nice plug) is find quotes on the site indicating that the FRC advocates overthrowing the US Constitution and wishes to institute a "Dominionist Theocracy."

Good luck with that.

Until then, you're just blowing leftist/atheist propaganda and unsubstantiated smears in true Alinsky fashion out your ass.

So, Seth, do Bachmann or Perry support the FRC program?

Why would it be wrong for them to do so? Just because you're an Atheist who doesn't like the FRC doesn't mean it's a seditious organization intent on installing a "Dominionist theocracy" in the United States. That's just so much bilge and bullshit that Atheist with the intellect of a slug spout as anti-theist propaganda that has quite literally no connection whatsoever to truth.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Why would it be wrong for them to do so? Just because you're an Atheist who doesn't like the FRC doesn't mean it's a seditious organization intent on installing a "Dominionist theocracy" in the United States. That's just so much bilge and bullshit that Atheist with the intellect of a slug spout as anti-theist propaganda that has quite literally no connection whatsoever to truth.

Seth, you funny funny man. Me likey you.

[MrJonno]

It's pure fearmongering mendacity.

There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the current presidential candidates are interested in creating a Christian "dominionist" theocracy even if they could, which they can't.

And the propaganda in the OP proves this claim. It's utter tripe and nothing more than an asinine and ill-informed personal opinion from some unnamed source. The left is notorious for pulling propagandistic lies and half-truths out of their ass and parading it as truth, as in this case.

And Al Jazeera is hardly a credible source...ever...but particularly when it comes to Christian-bashing. It's a Muslim radical yellow-journalism rag not ever worth wiping your ass with.

Coming from someone who thinks Fox News has any connection from reality, the BBC and Al Jazeera are probably the most reliable new sources out there