The Royal Wedding

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by rachelbean » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:41 pm

Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:
Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:

Yes, I empathise with your point of contention, however, I agree with Thomas Paine when he says GTFO DIRTY 'MERKIN, GO PLAT YOUR HAIR.
Why is one of the founding fathers of the United States telling me to go plat (plait? As in braid?) my hair? :dunno:
Common Sense, silly! :{D He wants you to look pretty!
Oh, how sweet! :teef:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:43 pm

rachelbean wrote:
Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:
Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:

Yes, I empathise with your point of contention, however, I agree with Thomas Paine when he says GTFO DIRTY 'MERKIN, GO PLAT YOUR HAIR.
Why is one of the founding fathers of the United States telling me to go plat (plait? As in braid?) my hair? :dunno:
Common Sense, silly! :{D He wants you to look pretty!
Oh, how sweet! :teef:

GET IT? :{D
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
egbert
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by egbert » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:50 pm

The Prince (Charles) pinned part of the blame on Galileo. Criticising the profit imperative behind much scientific research, he said: “This imbalance, where mechanistic thinking is so predominant, goes back at least to Galileo’s assertion that there is nothing in nature but quantity and motion.

“This is the view that continues to frame the general perception of the way the world works, and how we fit within the scheme of things.

“As a result, Nature has been completely objectified — ‘She’ has become an ‘it’ — and we are persuaded to concentrate on the material aspect of reality that fits within Galileo’s scheme.” The Prince said that he believed “green technology” alone could not resolve the world’s environmental problems. Instead, the West must do something about its “deep, inner crisis of the soul”.

Speaking at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies to mark its 25th anniversary, the Prince — who is patron of the centre — said that the West had been been “de-souled” by consumerism.
OH, the HYPOCRISY!
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41171
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Svartalf » Sun May 01, 2011 10:43 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:2011....and there is still such a thing as a hereditary monarchy...
You prefer demagogic rule or plutocracy?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
egbert
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by egbert » Sun May 01, 2011 2:29 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:2011....and there is still such a thing as a hereditary monarchy...
You prefer demagogic rule or plutocracy?
Islamic Rule is inevitable...
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Warren Dew » Mon May 02, 2011 4:20 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole.
Pretty sure most of that money goes to employ people.

User avatar
egbert
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by egbert » Mon May 02, 2011 8:21 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole.
Pretty sure most of that money goes to employ people.
Ah, one of these economies....

Image
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:18 pm

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests