Yep, the "before the mass" berthing areas, in the bow, were outside the armor.klr wrote:The actual armour layout, from a 1923 diagram:
Poor anti-torpedo protection (typical for designs at the time), but otherwise good.
On-topic derail: Battleships
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: So, they shoved a Battleship up my ass...
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
It was manned by Frenchmen?klr wrote:5 IKU's to anyone who can tell me why the X (no. 3) turret isn't in a firing position like the others.
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Was that picture taken After 16 September 1943 when she had been hit by German guided bombs and she could only use 6 of her guns ?klr wrote:Prussia Cove? Isn't it time that was renamed to something more patriotic?Clinton Huxley wrote:There's a lump of wood from HMS Warspite set up on a cliff at Prussia Cove in Cornwall. Walked past it on me hols a few weeks ago.
By coincidence, one of my brothers and his family spent a couple of days in that part of merry olde England a few weeks ago as well. I must ask them if they spotted any nobility out in the open.
Going back to this photo of Warspite:
5 IKU's to anyone who can tell me why the X (no. 3) turret isn't in a firing position like the others.




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
The pix is from Normandy, so the chronology is correct.
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Feck wrote:Was that picture taken After 16 September 1943 when she had been hit by German guided bombs and she could only use 6 of her guns ?klr wrote:Prussia Cove? Isn't it time that was renamed to something more patriotic?Clinton Huxley wrote:There's a lump of wood from HMS Warspite set up on a cliff at Prussia Cove in Cornwall. Walked past it on me hols a few weeks ago.
By coincidence, one of my brothers and his family spent a couple of days in that part of merry olde England a few weeks ago as well. I must ask them if they spotted any nobility out in the open.
Going back to this photo of Warspite:
5 IKU's to anyone who can tell me why the X (no. 3) turret isn't in a firing position like the others.

As stated, this was from the Normandy landings.
Incorrect, but a better answer somehow.Gawdzilla wrote:It was manned by Frenchmen?klr wrote:5 IKU's to anyone who can tell me why the X (no. 3) turret isn't in a firing position like the others.

God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
That was actually a subtle hint that it was Normandy. The French forces had to be given a little extra encouragement considering they were very likely about to accidentally kill some of their countrymen in the coming barrage. I have the speech DeGaulle directed to them somewhere in these terabytes of files.klr wrote:Incorrect, but a better answer somehow.Gawdzilla wrote:It was manned by Frenchmen?klr wrote:5 IKU's to anyone who can tell me why the X (no. 3) turret isn't in a firing position like the others.
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
The destroyer USS Arthur Radford was sunk off the coast not far from my old summertime stomping grounds yesterday - it was decommissioned and will now be used to create the largest artificial reef in the Atlantic.
Video: http://www.wdel.com/story.php?id=36752
Images: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/2 ... d|mostview
Stripped and gutted it just doesn't look as impressive.
Video: http://www.wdel.com/story.php?id=36752
Images: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/2 ... d|mostview
Stripped and gutted it just doesn't look as impressive.
Who needs a signature anyway?
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Artificial reefs are great! I did a study of them for Oceanography 101, and the time for fish to start investigating them averaged one hour. In one week there were permanent residents, on average. (Time was much shorter when there was no other handy shelter in the area.) All the "new" reefs were fishable within six months, that being an arbitrary time set to allow establishment.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51231
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Not a battleship but a destroyer. Why is there a Dalek, a huge one, standing on the deck?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_45_destroyer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_45_destroyer

- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Tero wrote:Not a battleship but a destroyer. Why is there a Dalek, a huge one, standing on the deck?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_45_destroyer

Um, the tower is for radar similar to the American Aegis systems. They don't rotate, they're "electronically aimed" and if you ask any more about that I'd have to kill you. The horizontal beams are probably the receivers for that radar system.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51231
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
Ah, so the Dalek is not for walking off and invading.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: On-topic derail: Battleships
That shot reminds me of the cartoon: Admiral is standing on the pier with a huge aircraft carrier behind him. He's addressing the press. "Gentlemen, the ship behind me is invisible."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests