MrJonno wrote:I wouldnt get into an argument with Seth about the best way to kill people as I'm sure he is an expert but as a civilian thats about saying you are an expert in raping children not exactly something to boast about
Wtf?
People, for the second time today, can we lay off the getting personal about other members.
Attack the argument not the person, or what the hell that mantra is.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
Gallstones wrote: I think I could love you like a brother.
Could there be Tannerite too?
Something could be worked out. The National Guard will be training hear in the near future. There will be Bradleys. With 20mm chain guns. Tree will die for the good of the State.
This is exactly why Trees need guns.
Would they be armed, or branched?
Those pine cones look suspicious like grenades. Best be sure of it.
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”
Gallstones wrote: I think I could love you like a brother.
Could there be Tannerite too?
Something could be worked out. The National Guard will be training hear in the near future. There will be Bradleys. With 20mm chain guns. Tree will die for the good of the State.
This is exactly why Trees need guns.
Would they be armed, or branched?
Not trees but what the hell:
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
Gallstones wrote:Anyone else here think Seth and Gawdzilla are like an old married couple?
They have that love-hate thing going on.
Just two alphas posturing. They're probably walking around their properties and "marking" their territory as well......
If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.-Red Green
"Yo". Rocky
"Never been worried about what other people see when they look at me". Gawdzilla
"No friends currently defined." Friends & Foes.
If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.-Red Green
"Yo". Rocky
"Never been worried about what other people see when they look at me". Gawdzilla
"No friends currently defined." Friends & Foes.
Gallstones wrote: I think I could love you like a brother.
Could there be Tannerite too?
Something could be worked out. The National Guard will be training hear in the near future. There will be Bradleys. With 20mm chain guns. Tree will die for the good of the State.
This is exactly why Trees need guns.
Would they be armed, or branched?
I see that you are a proponent of waiving any restriction to the exercizing of one's right to arm bears.
BTW, how easy are guns to score in Norway? and what about that frangible ammo he used... I'd not expect that to be allowed to civilians, or does it make for good hunting ammunition?
Svartalf wrote:BTW, how easy are guns to score in Norway? and what about that frangible ammo he used... I'd not expect that to be allowed to civilians, or does it make for good hunting ammunition?
I could have one after six months, legally. Six months and a certain amount of training at a gun club. A buddy at work has five guns and a rifle.
The ammo is used for hunting to make the animal suffer less, I guess.
To own a gun in Norway, one must document a use for the gun. By far, the most common grounds for civilian ownership are hunting and sports shooting, in that order. Other needs can include special guard duties or self defence, but the first is rare and the second is practically never accepted as a reason for gun ownership.
There are special rules for collectors of guns. They are exempt from many parts of the regulation, but, in turn, they must meet even more narrow qualifications. Collectors may purchase, but not fire without permission, all kinds of guns in their respective areas of interest, which they have defined in advance.
Ownership is regulated in paragraph 7,[1] and responsibility for issuing a gun ownership license is given to the police authority in the applicant's district.
Rifle and shotgun ownership permission can be given to "sober and responsible" persons 18 years or older. The applicant for the permission must document a need for the weapon. Two exceptions exist to this age qualification. Persons under the age of 18, but over 16 may apply for rifle or shotgun ownership licence with the consent of parents or guardian. For handguns, the lowest ownership age is 21 with no exceptions allowed. For inherited weapons, it is up to the local police chief to make a decision based on the individual facts of the case.
An applicant must have a clean police record in order to obtain an ownership license.
I think I could love you like a brother.
The National Guard will be training hear in the near future. There will be Bradleys. With 20mm chain guns. Tree will die for the good of the State.
