Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
- stripes4
- Mrs Pawiz esq.
- Posts: 8013
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
- About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy - Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Women don't fear sex, or being approached. They fear the element that exists, that would take it to the next level, if refused. Having a good fuck is fantastic, if it's consentual, or even playing at not being consentual, but this isn't about sex, it's about feeling unsure of a situation and it's consequences. Dick wads.
Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Fuckingdevogue wrote:Good point.MrJonno wrote:I think its the objectifying bit that people are complaining about but I'm not exactly sure what is meant be it.No violence, no rape threat, no sexual assault, no need for legal recourse, no emotional trauma, no disrespect, no nastiness, no objectifying. Nothing.
People have multiple parts of their nature and sexual object is one of them. There are times when only some should be relevant, when my boss asks me to do something at work he isnt doing it as a friend or someone who needs one, he isn't doing it because I'm a forum warrior he's doing it because I know something about email systems.
I'm quite sure there are times when people want sex with someone else and arent particuarly interested in whether they are high level philosophers but quite simply because they have tits, so what!
I "objectify" Mrs Dev when we have sex and she "objectifies" me. I like to give her a good fucking and she likes to get it. None of that "making love" romantic sanitised shit.

no fences
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
You're not supposed to get horny!charlou wrote:Fuckingdevogue wrote:Good point.MrJonno wrote:I think its the objectifying bit that people are complaining about but I'm not exactly sure what is meant be it.No violence, no rape threat, no sexual assault, no need for legal recourse, no emotional trauma, no disrespect, no nastiness, no objectifying. Nothing.
People have multiple parts of their nature and sexual object is one of them. There are times when only some should be relevant, when my boss asks me to do something at work he isnt doing it as a friend or someone who needs one, he isn't doing it because I'm a forum warrior he's doing it because I know something about email systems.
I'm quite sure there are times when people want sex with someone else and arent particuarly interested in whether they are high level philosophers but quite simply because they have tits, so what!
I "objectify" Mrs Dev when we have sex and she "objectifies" me. I like to give her a good fucking and she likes to get it. None of that "making love" romantic sanitised shit.


Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
You're the one being so damned erotic.devogue wrote:You're not supposed to get horny!charlou wrote:Fuckingdevogue wrote:Good point.MrJonno wrote:I think its the objectifying bit that people are complaining about but I'm not exactly sure what is meant be it.No violence, no rape threat, no sexual assault, no need for legal recourse, no emotional trauma, no disrespect, no nastiness, no objectifying. Nothing.
People have multiple parts of their nature and sexual object is one of them. There are times when only some should be relevant, when my boss asks me to do something at work he isnt doing it as a friend or someone who needs one, he isn't doing it because I'm a forum warrior he's doing it because I know something about email systems.
I'm quite sure there are times when people want sex with someone else and arent particuarly interested in whether they are high level philosophers but quite simply because they have tits, so what!
I "objectify" Mrs Dev when we have sex and she "objectifies" me. I like to give her a good fucking and she likes to get it. None of that "making love" romantic sanitised shit.![]()

no fences
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Stop objectifying him!charlou wrote: You're the one being so damned erotic.


"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Geoff wrote:Stop objectifying him!charlou wrote: You're the one being so damned erotic.


- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
So life isn't perfect. Not everybody behaves in a way that's perfect for everybody else.stripes4 wrote:Women don't fear sex, or being approached. They fear the element that exists, that would take it to the next level, if refused. Having a good fuck is fantastic, if it's consentual, or even playing at not being consentual, but this isn't about sex, it's about feeling unsure of a situation and it's consequences. Dick wads.
You have to get used to things that are less than perfect. I don't detect any mention of the woman feeling threatened, just a bit insulted.
Well, that's part of life, and men suffer from it just as much as women.
Rejection can be humiliating for men, just as being propositioned can be for a woman.
It sounds like this guy was polite, so he's not a complete asshole.
He got rejected, so maybe his feelings were bruised too.
I hope the precious flower thinks back on this when she's older, and probably wishes somebody WAS actually interested.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Santa_Claus
- Your Imaginary Friend
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
- About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Methinks she ain't ever met Santa in a lift at 4am - or on a Bus
Sexism? she would be wiping that off her tits 


I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.
Come look inside Santa's Hole
You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!
Come look inside Santa's Hole

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!
- stripes4
- Mrs Pawiz esq.
- Posts: 8013
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
- About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy - Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Yes, and if we get raped we should be grateful someone got hard enough to do it!!!mistermack wrote:So life isn't perfect. Not everybody behaves in a way that's perfect for everybody else.stripes4 wrote:Women don't fear sex, or being approached. They fear the element that exists, that would take it to the next level, if refused. Having a good fuck is fantastic, if it's consentual, or even playing at not being consentual, but this isn't about sex, it's about feeling unsure of a situation and it's consequences. Dick wads.
You have to get used to things that are less than perfect. I don't detect any mention of the woman feeling threatened, just a bit insulted.
Well, that's part of life, and men suffer from it just as much as women.
Rejection can be humiliating for men, just as being propositioned can be for a woman.
It sounds like this guy was polite, so he's not a complete asshole.
He got rejected, so maybe his feelings were bruised too.
I hope the precious flower thinks back on this when she's older, and probably wishes somebody WAS actually interested.






Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
As nobody knows exactly how this guy went about asking her for coffee (tone of voice, etc.) then I don't think it's possible to say either way if it was acceptable or not. Depending on the delivery and demeanour it could range from perfectly fine and acceptable to grossly unacceptable.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
- stripes4
- Mrs Pawiz esq.
- Posts: 8013
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
- About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy - Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Pappa wrote:As nobody knows exactly how this guy went about asking her for coffee (tone of voice, etc.) then I don't think it's possible to say either way if it was acceptable or not. Depending on the delivery and demeanour it could range from perfectly fine and acceptable to grossly unacceptable.




Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
Well, actually, when I got raped, I WAS grateful that someone got me hard enough to do it !!!!!!!!!!!!!stripes4 wrote: Yes, and if we get raped we should be grateful someone got hard enough to do it!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
I've totally skim read this thread.stripes4 wrote:Pappa wrote:As nobody knows exactly how this guy went about asking her for coffee (tone of voice, etc.) then I don't think it's possible to say either way if it was acceptable or not. Depending on the delivery and demeanour it could range from perfectly fine and acceptable to grossly unacceptable.![]()
That's what I was trying to say!!!
![]()

For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
This guy just has terrible technique.
Meeting a chick in an elevator at the end of the night is not the last chance to pick up for the night. It is the first chance to pick up for the next day. What's wrong with offering to buy someone breakfast?
Non-threatening, easy-going. Says, "I want to get to know you." rather than, "I see you struck out as well. Wanna fuck?"
Meeting a chick in an elevator at the end of the night is not the last chance to pick up for the night. It is the first chance to pick up for the next day. What's wrong with offering to buy someone breakfast?
Non-threatening, easy-going. Says, "I want to get to know you." rather than, "I see you struck out as well. Wanna fuck?"
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?
That's probably what upset her. He was in effect saying " I don't find you attractive enough to ask out on a date, but I wouldn't mind a quick fuck".Nicko wrote:This guy just has terrible technique.
Meeting a chick in an elevator at the end of the night is not the last chance to pick up for the night. It is the first chance to pick up for the next day. What's wrong with offering to buy someone breakfast?
Non-threatening, easy-going. Says, "I want to get to know you." rather than, "I see you struck out as well. Wanna fuck?"
That's why she really felt insulted, she wasn't valued as highly as she felt she should have been.
That sort of thing isn't restricted to man-on-woman, women do the same thing to men.
Like cancelling a date with : "I can't go out with you tonight, because John has asked me out. But I'll give you a ring, if he changes his mind."
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests