Gallstones wrote:What men look for-----------what girls look for?
Did you make this yourself?
The center one doesn't show anything to look at. Should have used one of the Weiner pics.
charlou wrote:And those posts are topical, how?
It was a humorous item designed to bring a little levity to the thread. No, I didn't make it myself, so the men/girls references are what came with the image. I don't have a cow over references to men/boys women/girls guys/gals. Any distinction between men and women based on sex is sexist, so logically there is nothing "better" about calling men men and women women, rather than boys or girls. Girls refer to men as "boyfriends" and men refer to women as "girlfriends," and women refer to female friends as girls and girlfriends. It's not a big deal to me, and I've never understood the angst about it.
Are the posts "topical?" Yes, in a tangential sort of way they were topical. The thread was originally about "free to be me childrearing." It morphed into a a discussion of the generalized notion of genetic differences vs. learned/cultural/environmental differences. Making jokes about those issues ought not to be any more taboo than making jokes about other things, and it happens all the time on many threads on Rationalia.
That being said - the rule is that threads ought to stay on-topic, and I have no beef with that in principle. If the moderators felt some posts were off-topic, then so be it. Move them, and we'll all survive just nicely.
There is a lot of overreaction to the "battle of the sexes" jokes. There is nothing at all wrong with discussing sex differences, both cultural and genetic, and there is nothing wrong with joking about them. It's just a taboo subject that people adopt as their personal pet peeve and so it's then considered "crossing the line." Joke about religion, faith, and myriad other subjects - all good, and people who are offended can go fuck themselves. Joke about something "I" take seriously, and it's hateful and over the line.