Why would parents have input into medical procedures that are unimportant, but not the important ones?nellikin wrote:Do you really believe that at age 16 the parents still have the right to decide upon medical procedures of such profound importance. What if the parents oppose abortion and had the right to force the young lady to have a baby against her wishes? Does that respect her right to sovereignity over her body and life? When it comes to sex and abortion - once the body is old enough to conceive, the "child" (which I wouldn't actually call a 16 year old) needs to have rights into decisions made about her body. Of course, guidance and support are required in the matter, but if she doesn't feel like she can trust her parents, than a counsellor is the next best thing.
Is it statutory rape if both parties are underage? If she was 16 at the time, it wouldn't have been stat rape her, so I don't actually think it is relevant to this case (though in general perhaps it can be).
I haven't suggested the parents should be permitted to force anyone to have a baby. I'm talking about the conduct of some idiot school counselor to affirmatively cover up the action from the parents.
No 16 year old wants their parents to know they got knocked up. That doesn't mean the parents don't have a right to know. And, a school counselor is generally an incompetent moron. They just ask the kid if she feels comfortable talking to mom and dad, and if she says not, then poof - go ahead and let's keep it on the down-low.
Is it statutory rape if both parties are underage? In California, yes. In most places, a near age exception to the rule keeps it from being statutory rape. And, the article refers to 13 and 14 year olds getting pregnant and specifically stated that one of the issues was girls not wanting the guys who knocked them up getting prosecuted. So, the counselor helps cover it up. Affirmatively covering up a felony is generally itself a serious offense.