The Royal Wedding

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by rachelbean » Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:57 pm

Devogay wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
.Morticia. wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:2011....and there is still such a thing as a hereditary monarchy...

indeed

most european countries have one
Incorrect. And, it's a ridiculous concept. Backward. Silly.
Suffering from projection, are we? You're just jealous that we have a queen, and you don't. You have a black man, take that.
Weren't you just saying you wanted someone to blow them up? :think:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:58 pm

rachelbean wrote:
Devogay wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
.Morticia. wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:2011....and there is still such a thing as a hereditary monarchy...

indeed

most european countries have one
Incorrect. And, it's a ridiculous concept. Backward. Silly.
Suffering from projection, are we? You're just jealous that we have a queen, and you don't. You have a black man, take that.
Weren't you just saying you wanted someone to blow them up? :think:
I have mixed feelings.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by rachelbean » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:03 pm

Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by maiforpeace » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:04 pm

Devogay wrote: I have mixed feelings.
Indeed.

He wants to blow the Prince, and blow up Kate.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:05 pm

rachelbean wrote:Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:

Yes, I empathise with your point of contention, however, I agree with Thomas Paine when he says GTFO DIRTY 'MERKIN, GO PLAT YOUR HAIR.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:08 pm

AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:There's going to be republicans/crazy trots protesting on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. I would go if I gave a fuck, but then again, I don't :D
It's your dime...or ha'penny, or whatever you Limeys use for coin over there...

Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole. Freeloaders.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:09 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Devogay wrote: I have mixed feelings.
Indeed.

He wants to blow the Prince, and blow up Kate.

I don't understand the gay jokes of you liberals: you purport to tolerate homosexuality, and indeed, homosexuals; yet you're equally as persistent, equally as vicious when it comes to making rude, near insulting gay jokes. Fuckin' double standards, aye?
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by maiforpeace » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:11 pm

Devogay wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Devogay wrote: I have mixed feelings.
Indeed.

He wants to blow the Prince, and blow up Kate.

I don't understand the gay jokes of you liberals: you purport to tolerate homosexuality, and indeed, homosexuals; yet you're equally as persistent, equally as vicious when it comes to making rude, near insulting gay jokes. Fuckin' double standards, aye?
It has nothing to do with being liberal, it's just about you, Devogay. :tea:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
AnInconvenientScotsman
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 9:05 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by AnInconvenientScotsman » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:13 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:There's going to be republicans/crazy trots protesting on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. I would go if I gave a fuck, but then again, I don't :D
It's your dime...or ha'penny, or whatever you Limeys use for coin over there...

Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole. Freeloaders.
I do care about the money, but there's an election on and a referendum on our voting system - both of which are more important. So whilst I'd like to care at the moment, I don't. The time to make a song and dance about it will be when the Queen dies; Republic agrees with me.
When I feel sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead.
True story.
SUIT UP!
"Dear God, dear Lord, dear vague muscular man with a beard or a sword,
Dear good all seeing being; my way or the highway Yahweh,
The blue-balled anti-masturbator, the great all-loving faggot-hater
I thank your holy might, for making me both rich and white"

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:16 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Devogay wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Devogay wrote: I have mixed feelings.
Indeed.

He wants to blow the Prince, and blow up Kate.

I don't understand the gay jokes of you liberals: you purport to tolerate homosexuality, and indeed, homosexuals; yet you're equally as persistent, equally as vicious when it comes to making rude, near insulting gay jokes. Fuckin' double standards, aye?
It has nothing to do with being liberal, it's just about you, Devogay. :tea:
I suppose, but maybe I should start making Chinese jokes, as after all, you're from there...probably.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:18 pm

AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:There's going to be republicans/crazy trots protesting on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. I would go if I gave a fuck, but then again, I don't :D
It's your dime...or ha'penny, or whatever you Limeys use for coin over there...

Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole. Freeloaders.
I do care about the money, but there's an election on and a referendum on our voting system - both of which are more important. So whilst I'd like to care at the moment, I don't. The time to make a song and dance about it will be when the Queen dies; Republic agrees with me.
What's funny is that the 'No the Av' camp, which is augmented with pompous aristocrats and title-holders, argues that implementing AV would cost too much. LOLS £30 MILLION+ FOR MARRYING TWO INBREDS LOLOLOL
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
AnInconvenientScotsman
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 9:05 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by AnInconvenientScotsman » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:22 pm

Devogay wrote:
AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:There's going to be republicans/crazy trots protesting on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. I would go if I gave a fuck, but then again, I don't :D
It's your dime...or ha'penny, or whatever you Limeys use for coin over there...

Think of all the folks that could be employed on the money the "aristocrats" siphon off the public dole. Freeloaders.
I do care about the money, but there's an election on and a referendum on our voting system - both of which are more important. So whilst I'd like to care at the moment, I don't. The time to make a song and dance about it will be when the Queen dies; Republic agrees with me.
What's funny is that the 'No the Av' camp, which is augmented with pompous aristocrats and title-holders, argues that implementing AV would cost too much. LOLS £30 MILLION+ FOR MARRYING TWO INBREDS LOLOLOL
You mean the No to AV campaign, not camp. Plenty of people voting No are doing it for reasons other than the, frankly speaking, lies that have been propagated by the No campaign. The Yes to AV campaign has been similarly misleading.
When I feel sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead.
True story.
SUIT UP!
"Dear God, dear Lord, dear vague muscular man with a beard or a sword,
Dear good all seeing being; my way or the highway Yahweh,
The blue-balled anti-masturbator, the great all-loving faggot-hater
I thank your holy might, for making me both rich and white"

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by rachelbean » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:30 pm

Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:

Yes, I empathise with your point of contention, however, I agree with Thomas Paine when he says GTFO DIRTY 'MERKIN, GO PLAT YOUR HAIR.
Why is one of the founding fathers of the United States telling me to go plat (plait? As in braid?) my hair? :dunno:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:37 pm

You mean the No to AV campaign, not camp. Plenty of people voting No are doing it for reasons other than the, frankly speaking, lies that have been propagated by the No campaign. The Yes to AV campaign has been similarly misleading.
No, I meant camp. Contrast the celebrities in the Yes campaign in contrast to the No.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Lozzer » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:38 pm

rachelbean wrote:
Devogay wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Mixed feelings like you are smart enough to know how ridiculous a monarchy is but so much of your identity is wrapped up in being English that when a dirty foreigner mentions the queen you suddenly get snarky and nationalistic? :tea:

Yes, I empathise with your point of contention, however, I agree with Thomas Paine when he says GTFO DIRTY 'MERKIN, GO PLAT YOUR HAIR.
Why is one of the founding fathers of the United States telling me to go plat (plait? As in braid?) my hair? :dunno:
Common Sense, silly! :{D He wants you to look pretty!
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests