Most aspects of animal welfare (and possibly pleasure) are addressed by having animals in a free-ranging situation, rather than pens, feed-lots or cages...Warren Dew wrote:I would add that, in addition to minimizing suffering, we might want to take into account the pleasure those animals have in their lives. To the extent that meat eating provides an opportunity for animals to lead pleasurable lives, it can be seen as a moral positive, rather than a negative.JimC wrote:And perhaps the best response is:
"For those animals capable of feeling pain and suffering, choosing to eat them should involve minimising their pain and suffering during their life, and in the slaughtering process, as much as possible"
I'm sure there are other issues as well, but given a free-ranging existence, no overcrowding, adequate food and water, vetinary attention as required, humane transport and an instant death, I will eat 'em...




