Libya: should anything be done?

Post Reply
User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:01 am

Ian wrote:If the Hanoi government had collapsed and the South took over the north and unified the country under Saigon, would you still be championing "the fact that the country was liberated from foreign rule'?

I seriously doubt it. Your idea of "liberation" seems to be "the communists won". Not that it could've happened at all were it not for foreign intervention (i.e. supplies from the USSR). And leave it to you to put a smilie emoticon after I point out the sheer numbers of people who risk everything to flee your preferred system of government. And guess what else? Emigration from Vietnam peaked in the late 1980s - long after the war and any excuse that it was damaged infrastructure that forced many people to leave.

But I agree that this thread is about Libya.
Oh, don't let a little thing like history interfere with your outlook. Simply because Communism has been a failure everywhere it has ever been practiced, to one degree or another, and has everywhere been forced to adopt the expedients of capitalism while "maintaining the Revolution" -- and has everywhere been forced to incarcerate political prisoners -- is no reason to think that it is inherently flawed.

Also, in before the inevitable "No True Scotsman" fallacy re: communism: "There's never been a real Marxist state."
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by sandinista » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:25 am

Thumpalumpacus wrote:
Ian wrote:If the Hanoi government had collapsed and the South took over the north and unified the country under Saigon, would you still be championing "the fact that the country was liberated from foreign rule'?

I seriously doubt it. Your idea of "liberation" seems to be "the communists won". Not that it could've happened at all were it not for foreign intervention (i.e. supplies from the USSR). And leave it to you to put a smilie emoticon after I point out the sheer numbers of people who risk everything to flee your preferred system of government. And guess what else? Emigration from Vietnam peaked in the late 1980s - long after the war and any excuse that it was damaged infrastructure that forced many people to leave.

But I agree that this thread is about Libya.
Oh, don't let a little thing like history interfere with your outlook. Simply because Communism has been a failure everywhere it has ever been practiced, to one degree or another, and has everywhere been forced to adopt the expedients of capitalism while "maintaining the Revolution" -- and has everywhere been forced to incarcerate political prisoners -- is no reason to think that it is inherently flawed.

Also, in before the inevitable "No True Scotsman" fallacy re: communism: "There's never been a real Marxist state."
Depends how you define "Communism". What do you mean by "flawed"?
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:21 pm

sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote: Must be why the vast majority fled to the US....because they thought they had been destroyed by the US...makes perfect sense.
So...the US didn't destroy Vietnam? Interesting theory you've got there. Must have been bombs made of chocolate. All the unexploded bombs which exist to this day, must be harmless firecrackers as well.
Destroy? No - there was a war there, of course, and things did get blown up. But, destroy the whole country? No, of course not.

Your interesting theory that the Vietnamese resoundingly viewed the US as the "destroyer" and then thought it would be the best place to move...cuz they thought we sucked.
Destroy? Yes. A war? No...an invasion by the US which was countered by a popular struggle for independence and unification against the foreign invaders. Nice try at revisionist history...again :yawn:
That assumes that it the US vs. Vietnam, and not the US supporting part of the country and the USSR supporting the other part of the country. Again, the Party line is that USSR backed and propped up Hanoi was legitimate, while USA backed and propped up Saigon was not.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:25 pm

Thumpalumpacus wrote:
Also, in before the inevitable "No True Scotsman" fallacy re: communism: "There's never been a real Marxist state."
And...some will tell you that there never CAN be a real Marxist STATE, because Marxism suggests a "stateless" society. Many Marxists seem to be of the opinion that Marxism would bring about a new kind of society, stateless, where people just do everything out of a common and single sense of what is good for the society. Hard to see the flaw in that....

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:27 pm

sandinista wrote:
Thumpalumpacus wrote:
Ian wrote:If the Hanoi government had collapsed and the South took over the north and unified the country under Saigon, would you still be championing "the fact that the country was liberated from foreign rule'?

I seriously doubt it. Your idea of "liberation" seems to be "the communists won". Not that it could've happened at all were it not for foreign intervention (i.e. supplies from the USSR). And leave it to you to put a smilie emoticon after I point out the sheer numbers of people who risk everything to flee your preferred system of government. And guess what else? Emigration from Vietnam peaked in the late 1980s - long after the war and any excuse that it was damaged infrastructure that forced many people to leave.

But I agree that this thread is about Libya.
Oh, don't let a little thing like history interfere with your outlook. Simply because Communism has been a failure everywhere it has ever been practiced, to one degree or another, and has everywhere been forced to adopt the expedients of capitalism while "maintaining the Revolution" -- and has everywhere been forced to incarcerate political prisoners -- is no reason to think that it is inherently flawed.

Also, in before the inevitable "No True Scotsman" fallacy re: communism: "There's never been a real Marxist state."
Depends how you define "Communism". What do you mean by "flawed"?
Can you just define what you think those terms mean? You've used them yourself. Your tactic is sometimes "tell me what you mean by X" and then when someone gives you a definition you hand-wave it away and claim that the people are using the wrong definition. Let's just cut through the red tape, shall we, and just go with your definition.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:27 pm

sandinista wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Can you name one North or South American tribe at the time of Columbus who were the original occupants of their land?
There were many peoples on this land long before the spanish, british, americans, french etc.
Fail.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:05 pm

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... links.html

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by sandinista » Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:31 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote: Must be why the vast majority fled to the US....because they thought they had been destroyed by the US...makes perfect sense.
So...the US didn't destroy Vietnam? Interesting theory you've got there. Must have been bombs made of chocolate. All the unexploded bombs which exist to this day, must be harmless firecrackers as well.
Destroy? No - there was a war there, of course, and things did get blown up. But, destroy the whole country? No, of course not.

Your interesting theory that the Vietnamese resoundingly viewed the US as the "destroyer" and then thought it would be the best place to move...cuz they thought we sucked.
Destroy? Yes. A war? No...an invasion by the US which was countered by a popular struggle for independence and unification against the foreign invaders. Nice try at revisionist history...again :yawn:
That assumes that it the US vs. Vietnam, and not the US supporting part of the country and the USSR supporting the other part of the country. Again, the Party line is that USSR backed and propped up Hanoi was legitimate, while USA backed and propped up Saigon was not.
Yah...the Soviet Union bombed the shit out of Vietnam. Fail. It was the US vs Vietnam. No matter how many times you want to revise history.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:32 pm

The Soviets tooled NV like we tooled SV. Both sides were puppets.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by sandinista » Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:29 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:The Soviets tooled NV like we tooled SV. Both sides were puppets.
Really? The soviet union bombed SV, murdered millions of Vietnamese and sent in thousands of ground troops? Invisible Soviet technology I take it?
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:53 pm

sandinista wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:The Soviets tooled NV like we tooled SV. Both sides were puppets.
Really? The soviet union bombed SV, murdered millions of Vietnamese and sent in thousands of ground troops? Invisible Soviet technology I take it?
You really are innocent, aren't you? Totally naive and jumping up and down without a clue about whatever you can find to rant about. You're too weak to plan this game.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by sandinista » Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:57 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
sandinista wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:The Soviets tooled NV like we tooled SV. Both sides were puppets.
Really? The soviet union bombed SV, murdered millions of Vietnamese and sent in thousands of ground troops? Invisible Soviet technology I take it?
You really are innocent, aren't you? Totally naive and jumping up and down without a clue about whatever you can find to rant about. You're too weak to plan this game.
Nice way to avoid the question, blah blah blah, personal attack, blah blah blah. Same old, pathetic, delusional, naive old man response.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:35 pm

sandinista wrote:Depends how you define "Communism". What do you mean by "flawed"?
Please let me know if English is not your native tongue. I'll work with you on it, I'm cool with it.

As far as the definition of Communism goes, I think the formula "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is workable, if inexact. Of course, there's much more to it than that. This formulation, however, is facile.

When I say that it is flawed, what I mean is that as an operating philosophy this outlook ignores a major human quality, that of ownership and possessiveness. No one likes giving up their hard-earned comforts, privileges, and perqs to another person who may well just be sandbagging his way through life. When someone's possessions are removed by force, or by the threat of force, that is theft.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by sandinista » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:54 pm

Thumpalumpacus wrote:
When I say that it is flawed, what I mean is that as an operating philosophy this outlook ignores a major human quality, that of ownership and possessiveness. No one likes giving up their hard-earned comforts, privileges, and perqs to another person who may well just be sandbagging his way through life. When someone's possessions are removed by force, or by the threat of force, that is theft.
So, you actually want to discuss something? OK. As much as you may say, "this outlook ignores a major human quality, that of ownership and possessiveness", I could say that cooperating and group solidarity are just as powerful human qualities. It's about which qualities are rewarded more than the qualities themselves. "Human nature" is not static, it evolves just like everything else. As for what "no one likes", there are a lot of things that people do that they don't particularly like or approve of. Life isn't a free for all, at least life in a community. The term "theft" is dependent on what a particular law is, "theft" can be redefined as well. Anyone could claim that any, say tax, is theft. Property itself could be considered theft.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Libya: should anything be done?

Post by klr » Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:42 pm

Meanwhile, back in Libya: As chance would have it, I came across this quote from Montgomery about Allied air support in the Western Desert:
The moral effect of air action [on the enemy] is very great and out of all proportion to the material damage inflicted. In the reverse direction, the sight and sound of our own air forces operating against the enemy have an equally satisfactory effect on our own troops. A combination of the two has a profound influence on the most important single factor in war—morale
:eddy:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests