Well, Seth!

[Thinking Aloud]

This is the welcome thread for Seth.


I would like to propose that any and all posts in this thread which are not related to welcoming Seth to Ratinalia or are not typical Rationalia style derails about worthy and noble subjects such as cheese, bacon, or naughty bits be moved from this thread to a new thread in The Wilder Web.

Or into the other Seth thread. That should confuse things nicely.

[Tigger]

This is the welcome thread for Seth.


I would like to propose that any and all posts in this thread which are not related to welcoming Seth to Ratinalia or are not typical Rationalia style derails about worthy and noble subjects such as cheese, bacon, or naughty bits be moved from this thread to a new thread in The Wilder Web.

Or into the other Seth thread. That should confuse things nicely.

"Things" being me.
A double D rail thread.

[pErvinalia]

This is the welcome thread for Seth.


I would like to propose that any and all posts in this thread which are not related to welcoming Seth to Ratinalia or are not typical Rationalia style derails about worthy and noble subjects such as cheese, bacon, or naughty bits be moved from this thread to a new thread in The Wilder Web.

Or into the other Seth thread. That should confuse things nicely.

That's a better idea. I've got no fucking idea what thread i am posting in at the moment. I don't need a third thread to complicate things.

[pErvinalia]

My god, I read this and I hear you speaking with an Oklahoma accent.
I think that is because I had been hearing and reading just these very words for months coming from an Oklahoman. I thought at the time that it was an affectation of the individual---but no. It is a trait of mind that has more to do with world view and political ideology than personality or person. Us and them. "I have no expectations.....but we are incompatible." Failure of logic there.

Yeah right Gallstones, I'm an uneducated redneck right-wing hick (i'm assuming that is what you mean - i've got no idea what oklahomans sound or act like... gross generalisation, anyone?). Seth will be glad to hear i am no longer a socialist.

By the way, did you not see the mod note above?
Over and out.

This is not good news. I'm looking in all directions but I see no bridge across the divide.

You burnt those bridges a long time ago GS.

No. You are not understanding. You are jumping to conclusions and taking things personally.

BTW, why do you assume that Oklahoman is an uneducated redneck right-wing hick?
He is very much not.

Your words had already been being said to me for months before, and the voice that said them to me has an Oklahoma accent, because that is where he is from. It's not really about you at all.

Who the hell is "he"? What the hell does Oklahoma have to do with anything?

Well at least you aren't calling me a red-necked hick. So what exactly are you calling me?

I'm not calling you anything.

You said i sound like an Oklahoman and that our world views are incompatible. You are certainly calling me something, it's just that i've got no idea what it is.

It's about different mind sets and world views that are incompatible.
And how that sucks.

I wouldn't have a clue what your mind set is, and how it hypothetically differs from mine. We used to get on. You changed, i didn't.

Life changed. And then everything else does.

Let's blame LIFE then. <-- See what i did there?

[Scot Dutchy]

..... rules are clear for everyone to read. If a poster breaks them, they only have themselves to blame. This constant blame shifting that goes on is ridiculous.

I actually agree with this.

So do I. rEvolutionist has made some clear statements regarding the FUA here which is very woolly and a very grey area. The "play fair" rule can mean very different things to many people. Are we expected just keep pushing the boundaries until someone says "OH"?
I have been here quite often but there are seldom any decent topics to post on. Also the number of active members is always very low.
When I saw the wonder pair Seth and Gallstones his protector on RDF btw I wanted to warn the people here what they have invited in.
I personally do not dislike anyone on RS except Seth even our resident theists are more reasonable. The long drawn out discussions that was had with him on RDF and later RS were some of the worst I have ever experienced.
I am sure that the rational and normal people here will see very quickly what the quality of his postings is. The derails that he will cause in order to turn any thread into a vehicle for his propaganda will be immense and many.
Remember in Seth’s world anything left of the tea baggers is communist/fascist so be warned.
For him even an organisation like WHO (World Health Organisation) is communist and can’t be trusted.

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

[Robert_S]

Well dammitt, Seth's here and he's always had a right to join so what the fuck is the point of bringing more issues from RatSkep issues here???

If it's as bad as people are saying, we'll notice it without it being pointed out and deal with it. As it stands, I'm going to be very, very, very slow to judge Seth because I fear I might have been biased by all the negative stuff I've heard about him.


-------this was edited in later

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

They actually read "Play nice, please ."

http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3449

Although I am thinking proposing a change to:

"Play Nice Please !!! "
because I like it.

[Thinking Aloud]

So do I. rEvolutionist has made some clear statements regarding the FUA here which is very woolly and a very grey area. The "play fair" rule can mean very different things to many people. Are we expected just keep pushing the boundaries until someone says "OH"?

We have "context" to judge a thing on.

I have been here quite often but there are seldom any decent topics to post on.

Your opinion. Some of us happen to like indecent topics.

Also the number of active members is always very low.

Or, to put it another way, the number of active members is comfortable for the nature of this forum.

When I saw the wonder pair Seth and Gallstones his protector on RDF btw I wanted to warn the people here what they have invited in.

Then you were mistaken. Everyone is welcome to join Rationalia, and the invitation, as I understand it, was made by Gallstones, not by "the people here".

I personally do not dislike anyone on RS except Seth even our resident theists are more reasonable.

So?

The long drawn out discussions that was had with him on RDF and later RS were some of the worst I have ever experienced.

So?

I am sure that the rational and normal people here will see very quickly what the quality of his postings is.

If he ever gets to them for fighting his way through this constant stream of criticism.

The derails that he will cause in order to turn any thread into a vehicle for his propaganda will be immense and many.

I love the smell of prophesy in the morning! Constant posting of propaganda by anyone will usually earn the poster a little play pen of their own into which all such derails can be deposited, if it becomes annoying to everyone else. Not my own personal favourite solution, but it has the support of many here, and mostly works.

Remember in Seth’s world anything left of the tea baggers is communist/fascist so be warned.

It's hard to "remember" any such thing, never having had the experience of "Seth's world". I'll form my own opinions of new members here, thanks.

For him even an organisation like WHO (World Health Organisation) is communist and can’t be trusted.

I DON'T CARE.

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

Actually, it is. It's worked very well here for the best part of two years. And please leave the term "FUA" where it belongs - we don't have one here, we just have our Rules.

[Ayaan]

..... rules are clear for everyone to read. If a poster breaks them, they only have themselves to blame. This constant blame shifting that goes on is ridiculous.

I actually agree with this.

So do I. rEvolutionist has made some clear statements regarding the FUA here which is very woolly and a very grey area. The "play fair" rule can mean very different things to many people. Are we expected just keep pushing the boundaries until someone says "OH"?
I have been here quite often but there are seldom any decent topics to post on. Also the number of active members is always very low.
When I saw the wonder pair Seth and Gallstones his protector on RDF btw I wanted to warn the people here what they have invited in.
I personally do not dislike anyone on RS except Seth even our resident theists are more reasonable. The long drawn out discussions that was had with him on RDF and later RS were some of the worst I have ever experienced.
I am sure that the rational and normal people here will see very quickly what the quality of his postings is. The derails that he will cause in order to turn any thread into a vehicle for his propaganda will be immense and many.
Remember in Seth’s world anything left of the tea baggers is communist/fascist so be warned.
For him even an organisation like WHO (World Health Organisation) is communist and can’t be trusted.

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

Actually, it's 'play nice.' We do have a fairly short list of further rules and you can always ask if you have any questions.

[pErvinalia]

Well dammitt, Seth's here and he's always had a right to join so what the fuck is the point of bringing more issues from RatSkep issues here???

If it's as bad as people are saying, we'll notice it without it being pointed out and deal with it. As it stands, I'm going to be very, very, very slow to judge Seth because I fear I might have been biased by all the negative stuff I've heard about him.

YES! Our plan worked...

-------this was edited in later

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

They actually read "Play nice, please ."

http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3449

Ah well that makes all the difference then doesn't it?

[pErvinalia]

And where the bloody hell is Seth? Is he sleeping again?

[normal]

Well dammitt, Seth's here and he's always had a right to join so what the fuck is the point of bringing more issues from RatSkep issues here???

If it's as bad as people are saying, we'll notice it without it being pointed out and deal with it. As it stands, I'm going to be very, very, very slow to judge Seth because I fear I might have been biased by all the negative stuff I've heard about him.

YES! Our plan worked...

-------this was edited in later

I wish as does rEvolutionist that the FUA here was more clearer. A vague “play fair” is not enough.

They actually read "Play nice, please ."

http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3449

Ah well that makes all the difference then doesn't it?

Yes. If you're grown up and mentally well it should be easy not to be an asshole and actually play nice. So I think it works well for a site that (often) focuses on being a community rather than a knowledge base, debate corner or other type of forum.

Did you mean it when you said you love me?

[Azathoth]

Rev is getting a rough Norwegian manloving in 5...4.....3....

[pErvinalia]

Did you mean it when you said you love me?

Only if it's true what they say, that you're a Norwegian. Although, you do look disturbingly like Seth Rogen.

[borealis]

Rev is getting a rough Norwegian manloving in 5...4.....3....

[normal]

Did you mean it when you said you love me?

Only if it's true what they say, that you're a Norwegian. Although, you do look disturbingly like Seth Rogen.

lol, I never heard that before. But he looks good, so I guess that's fine (thanks)

I think Rationalia is a good place for mature people wanting a society to have fun, breathe out and relax in. I don't think we serve any other purpose, and I think that's a good thing.
Enjoying this forum is easier if you approach it with that intent.