-
sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
-
Contact:
Post
by sandinista » Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:50 am
wouldn't put to much faith in that list
#1 Julian Assange
#2 Recep Tayyip Erdogan
#3 Lady Gaga
#4 Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
#5 Glenn Beck
#6 Barack Obama
#7 Steve Jobs
#8 The Chilean Miners
#9 The Unemployed American
#0 Mark Zuckerberg
person of the year? Lasy Gaga? John Stewart? Glenn Beck, Obama, wtf? The Chilean miners...that is one messed up list.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
-
Orphia Nay
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:02 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by Orphia Nay » Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:59 am
Oh, no, I wouldn't either. FWIW, I voted for Jon Stewart & Stephen Colbert.
TIME will announce their choice for Person of the Year on Wednesday.
-
sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
-
Contact:
Post
by sandinista » Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:05 am
Orphia Nay wrote:Oh, no, I wouldn't either. FWIW, I voted for Jon Stewart & Stephen Colbert.
TIME will announce their choice for Person of the Year on Wednesday.
so there was a choice for who to vote for? On what basis?
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
-
Gawd
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Gawd » Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:11 am
Orphia Nay wrote:JimC wrote:Thinking about the future of WikiLeaks, I sincerely hope the publicity means that they will attract whistle blowers from a variety of other countries. It has been a little too relentlessly anti-US...
Would love to see some material (at a similar level of secrecy & importance) from Russia, China, Iran, Israel etc...
Mind you, whistleblowers there would face much harder penalties, and the security organs of those countries may pursue the WikiLeaks organisation with a certain vigour...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informatio ... _WikiLeaks
They've released information on a nuclear accident in Iran, and videos of Tibetan protests against China, and information on a number of other countries such as Australia, Denmark, Peru, Iceland, Ivory Coast, and Germany. But I guess most of us only hear about the US stuff.
That's not the reason. I've seen this before in the "I Hate Israel" sub-forum where pro-Israelis say that only Jews get targeted when it's obvious what's really going on.
-
Orphia Nay
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:02 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by Orphia Nay » Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:27 am
sandinista wrote:Orphia Nay wrote:Oh, no, I wouldn't either. FWIW, I voted for Jon Stewart & Stephen Colbert.
TIME will announce their choice for Person of the Year on Wednesday.
so there was a choice for who to vote for? On what basis?
Here's the list of candidates.
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packa ... 34,00.html
So there wasn't really many to choose from. TIME's basis for each person is shown if you click on the names.
It's hardly a scientific poll.
I just voted for a bit of fun, and to support Stewart & Colbert whom I've spent a lot of time watching this year.
-
Orphia Nay
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:02 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by Orphia Nay » Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:30 am
Gawd wrote:Orphia Nay wrote:JimC wrote:Thinking about the future of WikiLeaks, I sincerely hope the publicity means that they will attract whistle blowers from a variety of other countries. It has been a little too relentlessly anti-US...
Would love to see some material (at a similar level of secrecy & importance) from Russia, China, Iran, Israel etc...
Mind you, whistleblowers there would face much harder penalties, and the security organs of those countries may pursue the WikiLeaks organisation with a certain vigour...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informatio ... _WikiLeaks
They've released information on a nuclear accident in Iran, and videos of Tibetan protests against China, and information on a number of other countries such as Australia, Denmark, Peru, Iceland, Ivory Coast, and Germany. But I guess most of us only hear about the US stuff.
That's not the reason. I've seen this before in the "I Hate Israel" sub-forum where pro-Israelis say that only Jews get targeted when it's obvious what's really going on.
I didn't give any reasons for anything. I really don't know what you're replying to - is it to me? Cheers.

-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74171
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:34 am
Orphia Nay wrote:JimC wrote:Thinking about the future of WikiLeaks, I sincerely hope the publicity means that they will attract whistle blowers from a variety of other countries. It has been a little too relentlessly anti-US...
Would love to see some material (at a similar level of secrecy & importance) from Russia, China, Iran, Israel etc...
Mind you, whistleblowers there would face much harder penalties, and the security organs of those countries may pursue the WikiLeaks organisation with a certain vigour...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informatio ... _WikiLeaks
They've released information on a nuclear accident in Iran, and videos of Tibetan protests against China, and information on a number of other countries such as Australia, Denmark, Peru, Iceland, Ivory Coast, and Germany. But I guess most of us only hear about the US stuff.
From my newspaper reading, the Australian connection seems mostly to be US embassy comments on players in the Australian political scene...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
Orphia Nay
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:02 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by Orphia Nay » Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:05 am
JimC wrote:From my newspaper reading, the Australian connection seems mostly to be US embassy comments on players in the Australian political scene...
Ah, yes, oops, good catch!

-
maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Post
by maiforpeace » Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:34 pm
Orphia Nay wrote:Oh, no, I wouldn't either. FWIW, I voted for Jon Stewart & Stephen Colbert.
TIME will announce their choice for Person of the Year on Wednesday.
Time magazine already announced their choice - Mark Zuckerberg. On Wednesday they will announce the results of the public poll.
sandinista wrote:so there was a choice for who to vote for? On what basis?
The Person of the Year (formerly Man of the Year) is an annual issue of the United States news magazine Time that features and profiles a person, couple, group, idea, place, or machine that "for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year."
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests