What avoiding? I addressed that question in both my posts.Gawdzilla wrote:Why? I see we're avoiding the question of "Why can't a society remove a dangerous person if that's the rational thing to do?"
Psychoserenity wrote:Actually I don't reject it for emotional reasons at all; I reject it because, from my understanding of the way modern societies work, it generally makes things worse for everybody, compared with other solutions that we now have.
We have other solutions now that seem to cause less harm to society in general. I may be wrong about that but it's the only way I can compare it directly. Out of all the possible ways a society could function, I think ones without the death penalty are more likely to be better for everyone.Psychoserenity wrote:I'd agree that back in history, or in more primitive cultures, there have been times where the best thing people could do was bring a quick end to the life of someone that would otherwise have killed others - but we should be long past that by now.

Anyway I promised myself that I wouldn't get involved in threads like this for a while. I only came in to give stripes a hug. I'm outta here.